Interprofessional student clinics: an economic evaluation of collaborative clinical placement education

被引:24
作者
Haines, Terry P. [1 ]
Kent, Fiona [2 ,3 ]
Keating, Jennifer L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Southern Hlth, Allied Hlth Res Unit, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, HealthPEER, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Peninsula Hlth, Dept Physiotherapy, Frankston, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
Economic analysis; evaluation research; interprofessional education; interprofessional evaluation; PRIMARY-CARE; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; PATIENT OUTCOMES; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.3109/13561820.2013.874983
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Interprofessional student clinics can be used to create clinical education placements for health professional students in addition to traditional hospital-based placements and present an opportunity to provide interprofessional learning experiences in a clinical context. To date, little consideration has been given in research literature as to whether such clinics are economically viable for a university to run. We conducted an economic evaluation based upon data generated during a pilot of an interprofessional student clinic based in Australia. Cost-minimization analyses of the student clinic as opposed to traditional profession-specific clinical education in hospitals were conducted from university, Commonwealth Government, state government and societal perspectives. Cost data gathered during the pilot study and market prices were used where available, while $AUD currency at 2011 values were used. Per student day of clinical education, the student clinic cost an additional $289, whereas the state government saved $49 and the Commonwealth Government saved $66. Overall, society paid an additional $175 per student day of clinical education using the student clinic as opposed to conventional hospital-based placements, indicating that traditional hospital-based placements are a cost-minimizing approach overall for providing clinical education. Although interprofessional student clinics have reported positive patient and student learning outcomes, further research is required to determine if these benefits can justify the additional cost of this model of education. Considerations for clinic sustainability are proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 298
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Framework for Action on Inter-professional Education and Collaborative Practice
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT J NURSING ED SCH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, J Res Interprof Pract Educ
[4]   Using collaborative learning to improve diabetes care and outcomes: The VIDA project [J].
Barcelo, Alberto ;
Cafiero, Elizabeth ;
de Boer, Melanie ;
Mesa, Alejandro Escobar ;
Lopez, Marcelina Garcia ;
Jimenez, Rosa Aurora ;
Esqueda, Agustin Lara ;
Martinez, Jose Antonio ;
Holguin, Esperanza Medina ;
Meiners, Micheline ;
Bonfil, Gerson Moreno ;
Ramirez, Saturnino Navarro ;
Flores, Enrique Perez ;
Robles, Sylvia .
PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2010, 4 (03) :145-153
[5]   Building capacity for the clinical placement of nursing students [J].
Barnett, Tony ;
Cross, Merylin ;
Jacob, Elisabeth ;
Shahwan-Akl, Lina ;
Welch, Anthony ;
Caldwell, Alison ;
Berry, Robyn .
COLLEGIAN, 2008, 15 (02) :55-61
[6]   The Crimson Care Collaborative: A Student-Faculty Initiative to Increase Medical Students' Early Exposure to Primary Care [J].
Berman, Rebecca ;
Powe, Camille ;
Carnevale, Julia ;
Chao, Andrew ;
Knudsen, Janine ;
Anthony Nguyen ;
Edgman-Levitan, Susan .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2012, 87 (05) :651-655
[7]  
Bradley D., 2008, Review of Australian higher education: Final report
[8]   Medical education in Australia: changes are needed [J].
Dahlenburg, GW .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2006, 184 (07) :319-320
[9]  
Department of Health (Victoria), 2011, TRAIN DEV GRANT 2011
[10]  
Department of Human Services, 2012, MED BAS