Comparison of six fit algorithms for the intravoxel incoherent motion model of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data of pancreatic cancer patients

被引:45
|
作者
Gurney-Champion, Oliver J. [1 ,2 ]
Klaassen, Remy [3 ]
Froeling, Martijn [4 ,5 ]
Barbieri, Sebastiano [6 ]
Stoker, Jaap [5 ]
Engelbrecht, Marc R. W. [5 ]
Wilmink, Johanna W. [3 ,7 ]
Besselink, Marc G. [8 ]
Bel, Arjan [9 ]
van Laarhoven, Hanneke W. M. [3 ]
Nederveen, Aart J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, Joint Dept Phys, London, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[3] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Radiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ New South Wales, Ctr Big Data Res Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[9] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
FITTING ALGORITHMS; IN-VIVO; MRI; PARAMETERS; PERFUSION; LIVER; COEFFICIENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; REPEATABILITY; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0194590
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model for diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) MRI data bears much promise as a tool for visualizing tumours and monitoring treatment response. To improve the currently poor precision of IVIM, several fit algorithms have been suggested. In this work, we compared the performance of two Bayesian IVIM fit algorithms and four other IVIM fit algorithms for pancreatic cancer imaging. DWI data were acquired in 14 pancreatic cancer patients during two MRI examinations. Three different measures of performance of the fitting algorithms were assessed: (i) uniqueness of fit parameters (Spearman's rho); (ii) precision (within-subject coefficient of variation, wCV); and (iii) contrast between tumour and normal-appearing pancreatic tissue. For the diffusivity D and perfusion fraction f, a Bayesian fit (IVIM-Bayesian-lin) offered the best trade-off between tumour contrast and precision. With the exception for IVIM-Bayesian-lin, all algorithms resulted in a very poor precision of the pseudo-diffusion coefficient D* with a wCV of more than 50%. The pseudo-diffusion coefficient D* of the Bayesian approaches were, however, significantly correlated with D and f. Therefore, the added value of fitting D* was considered limited in pancreatic cancer patients. The easier implemented least squares fit with fixed D* (IVIM-fixed) performed similar to IVIM-Bayesian-lin for f and D. In conclusion, the best performing IVIM fit algorithm was IVM-Bayesian-lin, but an easier to implement least squares fit with fixed D* performs similarly in pancreatic cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In Vivo Cardiac Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Quantification of Normal Perfusion and Diffusion Coefficients With Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Imaging
    Delattre, Benedicte M. A.
    Viallon, Magalie
    Wei, Hongjiang
    Zhu, Yuemin M.
    Feiweier, Thorsten
    Pai, Vinay M.
    Wen, Han
    Croisille, Pierre
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2012, 47 (11) : 662 - 670
  • [32] Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Primary Rectal Carcinoma: Correlation with Histopathology
    Lu, Baolan
    Yang, Xinyue
    Xiao, Xiaojuan
    Chen, Yan
    Yan, Xu
    Yu, Shenping
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2018, 24 : 2429 - 2436
  • [33] MRI-based staging of hepatic fibrosis: Comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging with magnetic resonance elastography
    Ichikawa, Shintaro
    Motosugi, Utaroh
    Morisaka, Hiroyuki
    Sano, Katsuhiro
    Ichikawa, Tomoaki
    Enomoto, Nobuyuki
    Matsuda, Masanori
    Fujii, Hideki
    Onishi, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (01) : 204 - 210
  • [34] Differentiating the lung lesions using Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging: a meta-analysis
    Liang, Jianye
    Li, Jing
    Li, Zhipeng
    Meng, Tiebao
    Chen, Jieting
    Ma, Weimei
    Chen, Shen
    Li, Xie
    Wu, Yaopan
    He, Ni
    BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [35] Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of solid pancreatic masses: reliability and usefulness for characterization
    De Robertis, Riccardo
    Cardobi, Nicolo
    Ortolani, Silvia
    Martini, Paolo Tinazzi
    Stemmer, Alto
    Grimm, Robert
    Gobbo, Stefano
    Butturini, Giovanni
    D'Onofrio, Mirko
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 44 (01) : 131 - 139
  • [36] Value of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating the pathological grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma
    Yu, Xiaoping
    Qin, Yuhui
    Liu, Yan
    Li, Congrui
    Xie, Yu
    Sun, Yan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 11 (10): : 10923 - 10928
  • [37] An In Vivo Verification of the Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Effect in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Abdomen
    Lemke, Andreas
    Laun, Frederik B.
    Simon, Dirk
    Stieltjes, Bram
    Schad, Lothar R.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2010, 64 (06) : 1580 - 1585
  • [38] Volumetric Analysis of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Predicting the Response to Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Jiang, Jianqin
    Leng, Yue
    Liu, Jia
    Yin, Jianbing
    Xiao, Yong
    Gu, Xiaowen
    Zhang, Liang
    Fu, Yigang
    Xu, Gaofeng
    Cui, Lei
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2022, 46 (03) : 406 - 412
  • [39] Histogram models based on intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging to predict nodal staging of rectal cancer
    Zhao, Li
    Liang, Meng
    Yang, Yang
    Zhao, Xinming
    Zhang, Hongmei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 142
  • [40] Diffusion-weighted imaging based on intravoxel incoherent motion: correlation with molecular prognostic factors and subtypes in breast cancer
    Yang, Dan
    Ren, Yike
    Wang, Guanying
    Wang, Chunhong
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2025, 66 (01) : 35 - 41