Connecting the dots: Theorizing and mapping learning entanglement through archaeology and design

被引:8
作者
Carvalho, Lucila [1 ]
Yeoman, Pippa [2 ]
机构
[1] Massey Univ, E Learning & Digital Technol, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1111/bjet.12761
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Designing for digitally enhanced learning has increased in complexity. In response, this paper calls for a reconceptualization of technologyas the reconfiguring of space, place, materials, time and social relationsenrolled and refashioned in emergent learning activity. Such reconceptualization requires analytical tools, methods and processes to map heterogeneous assemblages of people, tools and tasks. Educational researchers and designers are in need of approaches and theories that move beyond deterministic accounts about the utility of individual learning technologies, to connect theory, research and practice. Our research shows that in learning to distinguish between elements that are open to alteration through design and those that are not, educational designers gain deeper insights into the flows of matter, information and humans characteristic of productive networked learning environments. And this, in turn, gives rise to valued qualities of emergent learning activity in alignment with current theories about learning. In this paper, we present a series of methods adapted from archaeology and design, illustrating their power in tracing the complex webs of dependence characteristic of productive learning entanglement, with the aim of supporting future design for learning.
引用
收藏
页码:1104 / 1117
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Adler J., 2016, Research for educational change: Transforming researchers' insights into improvement in mathematics teaching and learning
  • [2] Alexander C., 1977, A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction
  • [3] Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research?
    Anderson, Terry
    Shattuck, Julie
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2012, 41 (01) : 16 - 25
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, NETWORKED LEARNING R, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-74857-3_10
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, AGEING, DOI DOI 10.1186/512979-018-0130-Y.ECOLLECTION2018
  • [6] Beetham H., 2013, Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning
  • [7] Towards sustainable technology-enhanced innovation in higher education: Advancing learning design by understanding and supporting teacher design practice
    Bennett, Sue
    Lockyer, Lori
    Agostinho, Shirley
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 49 (06) : 1014 - 1026
  • [8] Bernstein B., 2000, Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research
  • [9] A systematic literature review on maturity models for information systems in higher education institutions
    Carvalho, Joao Vidal
    Pereira, Rui Humberto
    Rocha, Alvaro
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 57 (04) : 434 - 449
  • [10] Carvalho L, 2017, PLACE-BASED SPACES FOR NETWORKED LEARNING, P1