Calculating Accurate Proton Chemical Shifts of Organic Molecules with Density Functional Methods and Modest Basis Sets

被引:266
作者
Jain, Rupal [1 ]
Bally, Thomas [1 ]
Rablen, Paul R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fribourg, Dept Chem, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
[2] Swarthmore Coll, Dept Chem & Biochem, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
C-13; H-1; PREDICTION; APPROXIMATION; STEREOISOMERS; PARAMETERS; HYDROGEN;
D O I
10.1021/jo900482q
中图分类号
O62 [有机化学];
学科分类号
070303 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to convince practitioners of H-1 NMR spectroscopy to consider simple quantum chemical calculations as a viable option to aid them in the assignment of their spectra. To this end, it is demonstrated, on a test set of 80 conformationally stable molecules of various kinds carrying different functional groups, that, in contrast to what is claimed in the literature, large basis sets are not needed to obtain rather accurate predictions of H-1 NMR chemical shifts by quantum chemical calculations. On the other hand, modeling the solvent by an SCRF-type calculation may improve certain predictions significantly. The best accuracy/cost ratio is provided by GIAO calculations in chloroform as a solvent with the specially parametrized WP04 functional of Cramer et al. using the cc-pVDZ or 6-31G** basis set, closely followed by similar calculations with the ubiquitious B3LYP functional (both predict H-1 chemical shifts with an average deviation of ca. 0.12 ppm, if the results are scaled linearly). A slightly higher accuracy can be attained by adding diffuse functions to. the basis set, but going to the triple-zeta basis sets which have invariably been used hitherto in calculations of chemical shifts does not lead to any improvement. The Popular increment schemes such as those implemented in the ChemDraw or ACD programs do not do nearly as well and are often incapable of correctly distinguishing stereoisomers.
引用
收藏
页码:4017 / 4023
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
*ACD IHNMR, 2009, ACD IHNMR PRED VERS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Modelling 1H NMR spectra of organic compounds: Theory, applications and NMR prediction software
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, J MOL STRUCT, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.MOLSTRUC.2017.03.014
[4]   DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL EXCHANGE-ENERGY APPROXIMATION WITH CORRECT ASYMPTOTIC-BEHAVIOR [J].
BECKE, AD .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1988, 38 (06) :3098-3100
[5]   Development of density functionals for thermochemical kinetics [J].
Boese, AD ;
Martin, JML .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 121 (08) :3405-3416
[6]  
*CAMBRIDGESOFT CO, CHEMDRAW ULTRA VERS
[7]  
CASBLANCA LE, 2008, J CHEM PHYS, V128
[8]   A comparison of models for calculating nuclear magnetic resonance shielding tensors [J].
Cheeseman, JR ;
Trucks, GW ;
Keith, TA ;
Frisch, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 104 (14) :5497-5509
[9]   On the calculation of hydrogen NMR chemical shielding [J].
Chesnut, DB .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 214 (01) :73-79
[10]  
Claridge T.D. W., 2008, High-Resolution NMR Techniques in Organic Chemistry, V27