An empirical comparison of machine learning techniques for chant classification

被引:0
|
作者
Kokkinidis, K. [1 ]
Mastoras, T. [1 ]
Tsagaris, A. [2 ]
Fotaris, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Macedonia, Dept Appl Informat, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Technol & Educ Inst Thessaloniki, Dept Automat Engn, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Univ Brighton, Sch Comp Engn & Math, Brighton, E Sussex, England
关键词
Human Computer Interaction; Singing Voice; Hidden Markov Models (HMM); Artificial Neural Networks (ANN); Sound signal; Machine Learning; Jackknife - Cross Validation; SPEECH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
A comparative evaluation of applying algorithms is presented, based on Hidden Markov Models and Artificial Neural Networks, in order to create a corpus of chants through vocal music recognition. The sound signal sequences of singing performances were captured, a training dataset was created based on the extracted sound features of the captured sound signal sequences and finally, the music recognition system was trained using the mentioned algorithms. Finally, the music recognition was performed and a score of successfully recognized of hymn performances was calculated by utilizing the cross - validation statistical method Jackknife. The results of the evaluation revealed that HMM algorithm is more efficient than ANN in order to train a machine learning system for chanting recognition. The findings can be used to build and/or improve the performance of machine learning systems for monophonic singing recognition.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diabetes Classification Using Machine Learning Techniques
    Phongying, Methaporn
    Hiriote, Sasiprapa
    COMPUTATION, 2023, 11 (05)
  • [42] Machine learning: a review of classification and combining techniques
    S. B. Kotsiantis
    I. D. Zaharakis
    P. E. Pintelas
    Artificial Intelligence Review, 2006, 26 : 159 - 190
  • [43] Music Genre Classification With Machine Learning Techniques
    Karatana, Ali
    Yildiz, Oktay
    2017 25TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (SIU), 2017,
  • [44] Comparison of supervised and unsupervised machine learning techniques for UXO classification using EMI data
    Bijamov, Alex
    Shubitidze, Fridon
    Fernandez, Juan Pablo
    Shamatava, Irma
    Barrowes, Benjamin E.
    O'Neill, Kevin
    DETECTION AND SENSING OF MINES, EXPLOSIVE OBJECTS, AND OBSCURED TARGETS XVI, 2011, 8017
  • [45] Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Smart Agriculture: Comparison of Supervised Classification Approaches
    Mouhssine, Rhafal
    Otman, Abdoun
    Haimoudi, El Khatir
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 11 (03) : 610 - 619
  • [46] An overview and comparison of machine-learning techniques for classification purposes in digital soil mapping
    Heung, Brandon
    Ho, Hung Chak
    Zhang, Jin
    Knudby, Anders
    Bulmer, Chuck E.
    Schmidt, Margaret G.
    GEODERMA, 2016, 265 : 62 - 77
  • [47] A Comparison of Bias Mitigation Techniques for Educational Classification Tasks Using Supervised Machine Learning
    Wongvorachan, Tarid
    Bulut, Okan
    Liu, Joyce Xinle
    Mazzullo, Elisabetta
    INFORMATION, 2024, 15 (06)
  • [48] Comparison of machine learning classification techniques to predict implantation success in an IVF treatment cycle
    Yigit, Pakize
    Bener, Abdulbari
    Karabulut, Seda
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 45 (05) : 923 - 934
  • [49] An Empirical Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Crop Prediction
    Mariammal, G.
    Suruliandi, A.
    Raja, S. P.
    Poongothai, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 8 (04): : 96 - 104
  • [50] An Empirical Comparison of Spectral Learning Methods for Classification
    Drake, Adam
    Ventura, Dan
    2013 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS (ICMLA 2013), VOL 1, 2013, : 9 - 14