An empirical comparison of machine learning techniques for chant classification

被引:0
|
作者
Kokkinidis, K. [1 ]
Mastoras, T. [1 ]
Tsagaris, A. [2 ]
Fotaris, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Macedonia, Dept Appl Informat, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Technol & Educ Inst Thessaloniki, Dept Automat Engn, Thessaloniki, Greece
[3] Univ Brighton, Sch Comp Engn & Math, Brighton, E Sussex, England
关键词
Human Computer Interaction; Singing Voice; Hidden Markov Models (HMM); Artificial Neural Networks (ANN); Sound signal; Machine Learning; Jackknife - Cross Validation; SPEECH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
A comparative evaluation of applying algorithms is presented, based on Hidden Markov Models and Artificial Neural Networks, in order to create a corpus of chants through vocal music recognition. The sound signal sequences of singing performances were captured, a training dataset was created based on the extracted sound features of the captured sound signal sequences and finally, the music recognition system was trained using the mentioned algorithms. Finally, the music recognition was performed and a score of successfully recognized of hymn performances was calculated by utilizing the cross - validation statistical method Jackknife. The results of the evaluation revealed that HMM algorithm is more efficient than ANN in order to train a machine learning system for chanting recognition. The findings can be used to build and/or improve the performance of machine learning systems for monophonic singing recognition.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Vehicle Classification using Road Side Sensors
    Kleyko, Denis
    Hostettler, Roland
    Birk, Wolfgang
    Osipov, Evgeny
    2015 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2015, : 572 - 577
  • [22] Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques for Epilepsy Classification and Detection in EEG Signal
    Janghel, Rekh Ram
    Verma, Archana
    Rathore, Yogesh Kumar
    DATA MANAGEMENT, ANALYTICS AND INNOVATION, ICDMAI 2019, VOL 1, 2020, 1042 : 425 - 438
  • [23] A comparison of machine learning techniques for taxonomic classification of teeth from the Family Bovidae
    Matthews, Gregory J.
    Brophy, Juliet K.
    Luetkemeier, Maxwell
    Gu, Hongie
    Thiruvathukal, George K.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2018, 45 (15) : 2773 - 2787
  • [24] The Classification of Breast Cancer with Machine Learning Techniques
    Kolay, Nurdan
    Erdogmus, Pakize
    2016 ELECTRIC ELECTRONICS, COMPUTER SCIENCE, BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERINGS' MEETING (EBBT), 2016,
  • [25] Machine learning and spectral techniques for lithological classification
    Parakh, Khushboo
    Thakur, Sanchari
    Chudasama, Bijal
    Tirodkar, Siddhesh
    Porwal, Alok
    Bhattacharya, Avik
    MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY, TECHNIQUES AND APPLICATIONS VI, 2016, 9880
  • [26] Machine Learning Classification Model Comparison
    Giudici, Paolo
    Gramegna, Alex
    Raffinetti, Emanuela
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2023, 87
  • [27] Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques
    Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Peloponnese, End of Karaiskaki, 22100 , Tripolis GR, Greece
    Inf, 2007, 3 (249-268):
  • [28] Machine Learning Techniques for Anomalies Detection and Classification
    Abdel-Aziz, Amira Sayed
    Hassanien, Aboul Ella
    Azar, Ahmad Taher
    Hanafi, Sanaa El-Ola
    ADVANCES IN SECURITY OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, 2013, 381 : 219 - +
  • [29] Machine Learning Techniques for Classification of Breast Cancer
    Osmanovic, Ahmed
    Halilovic, Sabina
    Ilah, Layla Abdel
    Fojnica, Adnan
    Gromilic, Zehra
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2018, VOL 1, 2019, 68 (01): : 197 - 200
  • [30] Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques
    Kotsiantis, S. B.
    INFORMATICA-JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS, 2007, 31 (03): : 249 - 268