Differences in Learning Characteristics Between Students With High, Average, and Low Levels of Academic Procrastination: Students' Views on Factors Influencing Their Learning

被引:31
作者
Visser, Lennart [1 ]
Korthagen, Fred A. J. [2 ]
Schoonenboom, Judith [3 ]
机构
[1] Driestar Christian Univ Teacher Educ, Masters Program Teachers, Gouda, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Social & Behav Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Vienna, Dept Educ, Vienna, Austria
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2018年 / 9卷
关键词
academic procrastination; regulation of learning activities; differences between academic procrastinators; interview study; qualitative; UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS; SELF-EFFICACY; ACTIVE PROCRASTINATION; POSITIVE EMOTIONS; PERFORMANCE; MOTIVATION; ACHIEVEMENT; BEHAVIOR; FAILURE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00808
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Within the field of procrastination, much research has been conducted on factors that have an influence on academic procrastination. Less is known about how such factors may differ for various students. In addition, not much is known about differences in the process of how factors influence students' learning and what creates differences in procrastination behavior between students with different levels of academic procrastination. In this study learning characteristics and the self-regulation behavior of three groups of students with different levels of academic procrastination were compared. The rationale behind this was that certain learning characteristics and self-regulation behaviors may play out differently in students with different levels of academic procrastination. Participants were first-year students (N = 22) with different levels of academic procrastination enrolled in an elementary teacher education program. The selection of the participants into three groups of students (low procrastination, n = 8; average procrastination, n = 8; high procrastination, n = 6) was based on their scores on a questionnaire measuring the students' levels of academic procrastination. From semi-structured interviews, six themes emerged that describe how students in the three groups deal with factors that influence the students' learning: degree program choice, getting started with study activities, engagement in study activities, ways of reacting to failure, view of oneself, and study results. This study shows the importance of looking at differences in how students deal with certain factors possibly negatively influencing their learning. Within the group of students with average and high levels of academic procrastination, factors influencing their learning are regularly present. These factors lead to procrastination behavior among students with high levels of academic procrastination, but this seems not the case among students with an average level of academic procrastination.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   My Instructor Made Me Do It: Task Characteristics of Procrastination [J].
Ackerman, David S. ;
Gross, Barbara L. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING EDUCATION, 2005, 27 (01) :5-13
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, QUAL INQ
[4]   Task aversiveness and procrastination: a multi-dimensional approach to task aversiveness across stages of personal projects [J].
Blunt, AK ;
Pychyl, TA .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2000, 28 (01) :153-167
[5]  
Brownlow S, 2000, J SOC BEHAV PERS, V15, P15
[6]  
Carver C.S., 2008, On the self-regulation of behavior, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174794
[7]  
Chu AHC, 2005, J SOC PSYCHOL, V145, P245
[8]   The role of the college classroom climate on academic procrastination [J].
Corkin, Danya M. ;
Yu, Shirley L. ;
Wolters, Christopher A. ;
Wiesner, Margit .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 32 :294-303
[9]   Procrastination, temptations, and incentives: The struggle between the present and the future in procrastinators and the punctual [J].
Dewitte, S ;
Schouwenburg, HC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2002, 16 (06) :469-489
[10]  
Ellis A., 1977, Overcoming Procrastination