Procedural Justice and Employee Engagement: Roles of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity Centrality

被引:125
作者
He, Hongwei [1 ]
Zhu, Weichun [2 ]
Zheng, Xiaoming [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Strathclyde Business Sch, Glasgow G4 0QU, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Labor Studies & Employment Relat, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Procedure justice; Moral identity; Organizational identification; Employee engagement; Group engagement model; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE RELATIONSHIPS; COMMON METHOD BIAS; WORK ENGAGEMENT; SITUATIONAL STRENGTH; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; ETHICAL LEADERSHIP; SELF-REGULATION; MEDIATING ROLE; MODEL; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-013-1774-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Workplace procedural justice is an important motivator for employee work attitude and performance. This research examines how procedural justice affects employee engagement. We developed three propositions. First, based on the group engagement model, we hypothesized that procedural justice enhances employee engagement through employee organizational identification. Second, employees with stronger moral identity centrality are more likely to be engaged in their jobs. Third, procedural justice compensates for the effect of moral identity centrality on employee engagement. Specifically, when procedural justice is higher, employee moral identity centrality plays a less significant role in employee engagement; whilst when procedural justice is lower, the effect of moral identity centrality on employee engagement is stronger. Research findings based on an employee survey in a leading financial service organization provide support for the above propositions.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 695
页数:15
相关论文
共 115 条
[51]   A Tale of Passion: Linking Job Passion and Cognitive Engagement to Employee Work Performance [J].
Ho, Violet T. ;
Wong, Sze-Sze ;
Lee, Chay Hoon .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2011, 48 (01) :26-47
[52]   INTERGROUP BEHAVIOR, SELF-STEREOTYPING AND THE SALIENCE OF SOCIAL CATEGORIES [J].
HOGG, MA ;
TURNER, JC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 26 :325-340
[53]   What fair procedures say about me: Self-construals and reactions to procedural fairness [J].
Holmvall, Camilla M. ;
Bobocel, D. Ramona .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2008, 105 (02) :147-168
[54]  
Hooper D., 2008, Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, V6, P53, DOI [DOI 10.21427/D7CF7R, 10.21427/D7CF7R, 10.3109/03005364000000039]
[55]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55
[56]   A meditation on mediation: Evidence that structural equations models perform better than regressions [J].
Iacobucci, Dawn ;
Saldanha, Neela ;
Deng, Xiaoyan .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 17 (02) :139-153
[57]  
KAHN WA, 1990, ACAD MANAGE J, V33, P692, DOI 10.5465/256287
[58]   TO BE FULLY THERE - PSYCHOLOGICAL PRESENCE AT WORK [J].
KAHN, WA .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1992, 45 (04) :321-349
[59]   Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee-Company Identification [J].
Kim, Hae-Ryong ;
Lee, Moonkyu ;
Lee, Hyoung-Tark ;
Kim, Na-Min .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 95 (04) :557-569
[60]   When team members' values differ: The moderating role of team leadership Preface [J].
Klein, Katherine J. ;
Knight, Andrew P. ;
Ziegert, Jonathan C. ;
Lim, Beng Chong ;
Saltz, Jessica L. .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2011, 114 (01) :25-36