Procedural Justice and Employee Engagement: Roles of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity Centrality

被引:125
作者
He, Hongwei [1 ]
Zhu, Weichun [2 ]
Zheng, Xiaoming [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Strathclyde Business Sch, Glasgow G4 0QU, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Labor Studies & Employment Relat, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Procedure justice; Moral identity; Organizational identification; Employee engagement; Group engagement model; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE RELATIONSHIPS; COMMON METHOD BIAS; WORK ENGAGEMENT; SITUATIONAL STRENGTH; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; ETHICAL LEADERSHIP; SELF-REGULATION; MEDIATING ROLE; MODEL; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-013-1774-3
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Workplace procedural justice is an important motivator for employee work attitude and performance. This research examines how procedural justice affects employee engagement. We developed three propositions. First, based on the group engagement model, we hypothesized that procedural justice enhances employee engagement through employee organizational identification. Second, employees with stronger moral identity centrality are more likely to be engaged in their jobs. Third, procedural justice compensates for the effect of moral identity centrality on employee engagement. Specifically, when procedural justice is higher, employee moral identity centrality plays a less significant role in employee engagement; whilst when procedural justice is lower, the effect of moral identity centrality on employee engagement is stronger. Research findings based on an employee survey in a leading financial service organization provide support for the above propositions.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 695
页数:15
相关论文
共 115 条
[11]   The crossover of burnout and work engagement among working couples [J].
Bakker, AB ;
Demerouti, E ;
Schaufeli, WB .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 2005, 58 (05) :661-689
[12]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[13]   ON PREDICTING SOME OF PEOPLE SOME OF TIME - SEARCH FOR CROSS-SITUATIONAL CONSISTENCIES IN BEHAVIOR [J].
BEM, DJ ;
ALLEN, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1974, 81 (06) :506-520
[14]   Reexamining the Workplace Justice to Outcome Relationship: Does Frame of Reference Matter? [J].
Bernerth, Jeremy ;
Walker, H. Jack .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2012, 49 (05) :945-969
[15]   Testing and Extending the Group Engagement Model: Linkages Between Social Identity, Procedural Justice, Economic Outcomes, and Extrarole Behavior [J].
Blader, Steven L. ;
Tyler, Tom R. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (02) :445-464
[16]  
Blasi A., 1984, MORALITY, P128
[17]  
Blau P.M., 1964, SOCIOL INQ, V34, P193, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1475-682X.1964.TB00583.X
[18]   Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: The role of the "strength" of the HRM system [J].
Bowen, DE ;
Ostroff, C .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2004, 29 (02) :203-221
[19]   Using Self-Definition to Predict the Influence of Procedural Justice on Organizational-, Interpersonal-, and Job/Task-Oriented Citizenship Behavior [J].
Brebels, Lieven ;
De Cremer, David ;
Van Dijke, Marius .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 40 (03) :731-763
[20]   Fairness as Social Responsibility: A Moral Self-regulation Account of Procedural Justice Enactment [J].
Brebels, Lieven ;
De Cremer, David ;
Van Dijke, Marius ;
Van Hiel, Alain .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2011, 22 :S47-S58