Bilateral Intercomparison of Spectral Directional Emissivity Measurement Between CENAM and PTB

被引:6
作者
Cardenas-Garcia, D. [1 ]
Monte, C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Nacl Metrol CENAM, Queretaro 76246, Qro, Mexico
[2] PTB, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Bilateral comparison; Emissivity; Radiation thermometry;
D O I
10.1007/s10765-014-1686-1
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Both Centro Nacional de Metrologia (CENAM, Mexico) and Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB, Germany) are national metrology institutes and provide the dissemination of the spectral directional emissivity as a calibration service. CENAM started this service recently. The emissivity measurement capability of PTB took part in two international comparisons performed in the past among other national institutes. The measurement instrumentation and techniques used for emissivity measurements at CENAM and PTB are both based on Fourier transform infrared spectrometers. Both setups are based on the principle of a spectral comparison of the radiances of the sample and blackbody radiator. In detail, the setups differ: CENAM has the capability of measuring the directional spectral emissivity normal to the sample surface, while PTB measures the directional spectral emissivity at angles of observation ranging from to , and provides the hemispherical spectral and total emissivity of samples as well. For this comparison, it was agreed to compare the value of the directional spectral emissivity normal to the sample surface obtained by CENAM with the one determined at an angle of by PTB. Four samples of different spectral directional emissivities were measured by the two institutes. For the samples, four copper disks with a diameter of 50 mm and a thickness of 5 mm were used. Three of them were coated with Comex 1402470 (white), 1402471 (aluminum), and 1402474 (black) paints, respectively, and the other one with Nextel 811-21 paint. Measurements were obtained for each sample at a temperature of about C, and in the spectral range from to ( to ). The description of the experimental setups used and the comparison results are presented in this paper. It was found that the results obtained at CENAM and at PTB agree well within the declared standard uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1309
页数:11
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
BNM-LNE PTB, 2000, 516 BNMLNE PTB EUR A
[2]  
Cardenas-Garcia D., 2013, J MEAS SCI, V8, P36
[3]  
Clausen S, 2002, TEMPMEKO 2001: 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TEMPERATURE AND THERMAL MEASUREMENT IN INDUSTRY AND SCIENCE, VOL 1 & 2, PROCEEDINGS, P259
[4]  
DeWitt D. P., 1989, THEORY PRACTICE RAD, P21
[5]  
Hanssen L., 2014, CCTWG9 BIPM
[6]  
Lohrengel J, 1996, PTB-MITT, V106, P259
[7]  
Monte C., 2010, HIGH TEMP-HIGH PRESS, V39, P151
[8]   The determination of the uncertainties of spectral emissivity measurements in air at the PTB [J].
Monte, Christian ;
Hollandt, Joerg .
METROLOGIA, 2010, 47 (02) :S172-S181
[9]   Analysis of the accuracy of methods for the direct measurement of emissivity [J].
Perez-Saez, Raul B. ;
del Campo, Leire ;
Tello, Manuel J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMOPHYSICS, 2008, 29 (03) :1141-1155
[10]   Quantifying demonstrated equivalence [J].
Wood, BM ;
Douglas, RJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 1999, 48 (02) :162-165