The 1993 intercomparison of the measurement of in vivo radioactivity

被引:6
|
作者
Kramer, GH
Loesch, RM
Olsen, PC
机构
[1] Radiat Protec Bur, Human Monitoring Lab, Ottawa, ON K1A 1C1, Canada
[2] US DOE, Off Hlth, Dept Energy Lab Accreditat Program, Washington, DC 20585 USA
[3] Pacific NW Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032943
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Canadian National Calibration Reference Centre for In-Vivo, Monitoring and the United States Department of Energy collaborated to offer an international intercomparison programme to whole-body counting facilities in 1993. The Human Monitoring Laboratory fabricated a phantom shell corresponding to a reference four-year-old child and Battelle Pacific Northwest National Laboratory filled the shell with radioactive tissue substitute polyurethane to simulate a uniform natural radioactivity and fission product distribution in soft tissues (K-40,Y-88,Cs-137). Participants were not informed of the radioactive content and were asked to determine the identity and amount of the radionuclides in the energy range 200-2000 keV. Although all nuclides were identified correctly, most participants reported activities for Y-88 and Cs-137 only. Each facility was asked to make an estimate of the 'worst case' precision and estimate their minimum detectable activity. The programme had 35 participants from 18 countries for a total of 43 counting systems. The programme began in April 1993 and ended on 1 Aug. 1995. The intercomparison has shown that all whole-body counters are phantom-size dependent and that size-dependent calibration factors should be used. The scanning bed geometry is less size-dependent than the other geometries when only the standard (man-sized) calibration factors are used; however, when applied, size correction factors remove this geometrical advantage and all configurations perform equally well.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 205
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] AN INTERCOMPARISON OF 5 AMMONIA MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
    WILLIAMS, EJ
    SANDHOLM, ST
    BRADSHAW, JD
    SCHENDEL, JS
    LANGFORD, AO
    QUINN, PK
    LEBEL, PJ
    VAY, SA
    ROBERTS, PD
    NORTON, RB
    WATKINS, BA
    BUHR, MP
    PARRISH, DD
    CALVERT, JG
    FEHSENFELD, FC
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1992, 97 (D11) : 11591 - 11611
  • [42] Measurement of gamma radioactivity in steel
    von Wachtendonk, HJ
    STAHL UND EISEN, 1999, 119 (01): : 61 - +
  • [43] MEASUREMENT OF RADIOACTIVITY IN BODY ORGANS
    不详
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE-NUKLEARMEDIZIN, 1972, 11 (03): : 203 - 225
  • [44] MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY BACKGROUND
    HEALY, JW
    NUCLEONICS, 1952, 10 (10): : 14 - 19
  • [45] COUNTING TIMES IN MEASUREMENT OF RADIOACTIVITY
    ENGLAND, JM
    MILLER, RG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 1969, 20 (01): : 1 - &
  • [46] NEW UNITS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF RADIOACTIVITY
    CONDON, EU
    CURTISS, LF
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1946, 19 (225): : 368 - 368
  • [47] NEW UNITS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF RADIOACTIVITY
    CONDON, EU
    CURTISS, LF
    PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1946, 69 (11-1): : 672 - 673
  • [48] MEASUREMENT OF RADIOACTIVITY IN BODY ORGANS
    不详
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1970, 14 (04): : 123 - +
  • [49] Radioactivity measurement and standardization in Thailand
    P. Wanabongse
    Y. Hino
    Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 2003, 255 : 21 - 26
  • [50] An intercomparison exercise for thoron gas measurement
    Ishikawa, T
    Cavallo, A
    Tokonami, S
    HIGH LEVELS OF NATURAL RADIATION AND RADON AREAS: RADIATION DOSE AND HEALTH EFFECTS, 2005, 1276 : 276 - 277