The 1993 intercomparison of the measurement of in vivo radioactivity

被引:6
|
作者
Kramer, GH
Loesch, RM
Olsen, PC
机构
[1] Radiat Protec Bur, Human Monitoring Lab, Ottawa, ON K1A 1C1, Canada
[2] US DOE, Off Hlth, Dept Energy Lab Accreditat Program, Washington, DC 20585 USA
[3] Pacific NW Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032943
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Canadian National Calibration Reference Centre for In-Vivo, Monitoring and the United States Department of Energy collaborated to offer an international intercomparison programme to whole-body counting facilities in 1993. The Human Monitoring Laboratory fabricated a phantom shell corresponding to a reference four-year-old child and Battelle Pacific Northwest National Laboratory filled the shell with radioactive tissue substitute polyurethane to simulate a uniform natural radioactivity and fission product distribution in soft tissues (K-40,Y-88,Cs-137). Participants were not informed of the radioactive content and were asked to determine the identity and amount of the radionuclides in the energy range 200-2000 keV. Although all nuclides were identified correctly, most participants reported activities for Y-88 and Cs-137 only. Each facility was asked to make an estimate of the 'worst case' precision and estimate their minimum detectable activity. The programme had 35 participants from 18 countries for a total of 43 counting systems. The programme began in April 1993 and ended on 1 Aug. 1995. The intercomparison has shown that all whole-body counters are phantom-size dependent and that size-dependent calibration factors should be used. The scanning bed geometry is less size-dependent than the other geometries when only the standard (man-sized) calibration factors are used; however, when applied, size correction factors remove this geometrical advantage and all configurations perform equally well.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 205
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MEASUREMENT OF BODY RADIOACTIVITY
    不详
    NATURE, 1957, 180 (4579) : 219 - 219
  • [22] ABSOLUTE MEASUREMENT OF RADIOACTIVITY
    BAERG, AP
    METROLOGIA, 1967, 3 (04) : 105 - &
  • [23] THE MEASUREMENT OF RADIOACTIVITY IN SOLUTION
    SOLOMON, AK
    ESTES, HD
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1948, 19 (01): : 47 - 50
  • [24] The measurement of radioactivity.
    von Weszelszky, J
    PHYSIKALISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 1912, 13 : 240 - 246
  • [25] INTERCOMPARISON OF VISIBILITY MEASUREMENT METHODS
    TOMBACH, I
    ALLARD, D
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION, 1980, 30 (02): : 134 - 142
  • [26] A review of data obtained in a series of radioactivity measurement intercomparison exercises in the UK: gamma-ray emitters 1989-1994
    Woods, MJ
    Jerome, SM
    Dean, JCJ
    Perkin, EME
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 173 (1-6) : 247 - 257
  • [27] European intercomparison of in vivo monitoring systems
    Thieme, M
    Hunt, EL
    Konig, K
    SchmittHannig, A
    Godde, R
    IRPA9 - 1996 INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON RADIATION PROTECTION / NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, PROCEEDINGS, VOL 2, 1996, : B402 - B404
  • [28] INTERCOMPARISON OF NO2 MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
    FEHSENFELD, FC
    DRUMMOND, JW
    ROYCHOWDHURY, UK
    GALVIN, PJ
    WILLIAMS, EJ
    BUHR, MP
    PARRISH, DD
    HUBLER, G
    LANGFORD, AO
    CALVERT, JG
    RIDLEY, BA
    GRAHEK, F
    HEIKES, BG
    KOK, GL
    SHETTER, JD
    WALEGA, JG
    ELSWORTH, CM
    NORTON, RB
    FAHEY, DW
    MURPHY, PC
    HOVERMALE, C
    MOHNEN, VA
    DEMERJIAN, KL
    MACKAY, GI
    SCHIFF, HI
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1990, 95 (D4) : 3579 - 3597
  • [29] Intercomparison of the Gulf Stream in ocean reanalyses: 1993-2010
    Chi, Lequan
    Wolfe, Christopher L. P.
    Hameed, Sultan
    OCEAN MODELLING, 2018, 125 : 1 - 21
  • [30] EFFICIENT MEASUREMENT OF RADIOACTIVITY IN OLIGONUCLEOTIDES
    GUPTA, KC
    BIOTECHNIQUES, 1992, 12 (02) : 226 - &