Service fundraising and the role of perceived donation efficacy in individual charitable giving

被引:27
作者
Carroll, Ryall [1 ]
Kachersky, Luke [2 ]
机构
[1] St Johns Univ, Tobin Coll Business, 8000 Utopia Pkwy, Queens, NY 11439 USA
[2] Fordham Univ, Gabelli Sch Business, 140 West 62nd St, New York, NY 10023 USA
关键词
Charitable giving; Charities; Donation behavior; Fundraising; Nonprofit marketing; NONPROFIT BRAND IMAGE; BEHAVIOR; MODEL; GUILT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.051
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Perceived donation efficacy (PDE) is the degree to which a donor believes that a charitable gift will make a difference in the cause that he or she is supporting. Extant research leaves important questions to be answered about the kinds of fundraising models that affect PDE, and PDE's subsequent influence on charitable giving. We find that PDE and, in turn, charitable giving can be impacted by a newly proposed fundraising model that substitutes volunteer service for miles walked in the more traditional "walk-a-thon" model. The real-world success of the service fundraising model is first established in a field study with an actual nonprofit organization. Subsequent experiments further suggest that the influence of fundraising models on PDE is broader than simply making more efficient use of donors' dollars. We also offer the first empirical evidence that PDE mediates the relationship between fundraising models and charitable giving.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 263
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Ajzen I., 1985, UNDERSTANDING ATTITU, P11
[2]   MARKET FOR LEMONS - QUALITY UNCERTAINTY AND MARKET MECHANISM [J].
AKERLOF, GA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1970, 84 (03) :488-500
[3]  
Andreoni J., 2006, Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity and Altruism, V2, P1201, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1574-0714(06)02018-5
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, DOI [10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.112, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.112]
[5]   Feelings that Make a Difference: How Guilt and Pride Convince Consumers of the Effectiveness of Sustainable Consumption Choices [J].
Antonetti, Paolo ;
Maklan, Stan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2014, 124 (01) :117-134
[6]   Stealing thunder: Analysis of the effects of proactive disclosure of crisis information [J].
Arpan, LM ;
Roskos-Ewoldsen, DR .
PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2005, 31 (03) :425-433
[7]   THE EXPLANATORY AND PREDICTIVE SCOPE OF SELF-EFFICACY THEORY [J].
BANDURA, A .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 4 (03) :359-373
[8]   PHYSICAL DISTANCE AND HELPING - SOME UNEXPECTED BENEFITS OF CROWDING IN ON OTHERS [J].
BARON, RA ;
BELL, PA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 6 (02) :95-104
[9]   Guilt and giving: A process model of empathy and efficacy [J].
Basil, Debra Z. ;
Ridgway, Nancy M. ;
Basil, Michael D. .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2008, 25 (01) :1-23
[10]   A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving [J].
Bekkers, Rene ;
Wiepking, Pamala .
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2011, 40 (05) :924-973