Theoretical comparison between post-combustion carbon capture technology and the use of blue and green H2 in existing natural gas combined cycles as CO2 mitigation strategies: A study under the context of mexican clean energy regulation

被引:20
作者
Diaz-Herrera, Pablo R. [1 ]
Ascanio, Gabriel [2 ]
Romero-Martinez, Ascencion [3 ]
Alcaraz-Calderon, Agustin M. [4 ]
Gonzalez-Diaz, Abigail [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Ingn, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ciencias Aplicadas & Tecnol, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[3] Inst Mexicano Petr, Direcc Invest Explorac & Prod, Gerencia Herramientas & Sistemas Pozos Instalac, Eje Cent Lazaro Cardenas 152, Mexico City 07730, DF, Mexico
[4] Inst Nacl Elect & Energias Limpias, Reforma 113, Cuernavaca 62490, Morelos, Mexico
关键词
Hydrogen-powered gas turbine; Blue hydrogen; Green hydrogen; Post-combustion carbon capture; Power-to-gas; Mexican clean energy regulation; POWER-PLANTS; HYDROGEN; COST; CORROSION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.076
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The objective of this work is to compare the theoretical implementation of three strategies for reducing CO2 emissions in existing natural gas combined cycles (NGCC) under the context of the Mexican clean energy regulation, namely: NGCC with post-combustion carbon capture plant (CCS); NGCC fueled with blends of natural gas and blue H-2 (bH(2)) or green H-2 (gH(2)). These options were analysed from the point of view of the end users in meeting the National goals in clean electricity generation during the period of 2020-2050. A techno-economic analysis was performed by considering different variables, such as clean energy certificate price, fuel costs, capital expenditure, operating cost and capacity factor plant. In general, the CCS shows a better economic performance than bH(2) and gH(2) cases for reducing carbon emissions in existing NGCCs. In a low natural gas price scenario ($1/MMBTU), the gH(2) case is economically attractive from gH(2) cost equal to or less than $ 0.9 per kg. Finally, it is found that under the current Mexican regulatory framework is not possible the incorporation of any of the technologies mentioned above, in which case, this regulation needs to be deeply amended in order to define new technical and administrative criteria for promoting the market entry of these technologies in the country. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2729 / 2754
页数:26
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, COPAR COSTOS PARAMET
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, AAVV Los amigos de Yolanda. Homenaje de los que fuimos sus companeros en el PST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Hydrogen steelmaking for a low -carbon economy
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, MILENIO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT, P431
[6]   Flexible production of green hydrogen and ammonia from variable solar and wind energy: Case study of Chile and Argentina [J].
Armijo, Julien ;
Philibert, Cedric .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (03) :1541-1558
[7]  
Ballinez R., 2018, HR RATINGS CONSIDERA, P24
[8]   Effects of hydrogen and steam addition on laminar burning velocity of methane-air premixed flame: Experimental and numerical analysis [J].
Boushaki, T. ;
Dhue, Y. ;
Selle, L. ;
Ferret, B. ;
Poinsot, T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (11) :9412-9422
[9]   Using hydrogen as gas turbine fuel [J].
Chiesa, P ;
Lozza, G ;
Mazzocchi, L .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2005, 127 (01) :73-80
[10]  
Chou V, 2013, COST PERFORMANCE RET