Coevolution is linked with phenotypic diversification but not speciation in avian brood parasites

被引:15
作者
Medina, Iliana [1 ]
Langmore, Naomi E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Dept Ecol Evolut & Genet, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
关键词
coevolution; diversification; phenotypic rates; brood parasitism; speciation; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; CUCULUS-CANORUS; HAWK MIMICRY; EVOLUTION; CUCKOOS; BIRDS; HOSTS; ADAPTATIONS; DIVERSITY; DEFENSE;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2015.2056
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Coevolution is often invoked as an engine of biological diversity. Avian brood parasites and their hosts provide one of the best-known examples of coevolution. Brood parasites lay their eggs in the nests of other species, selecting for host defences and reciprocal counteradaptations in parasites. In theory, this arms race should promote increased rates of speciation and phenotypic evolution. Here, we use recently developed methods to test whether the three largest avian brood parasitic lineages show changes in rates of phenotypic diversity and speciation relative to non-parasitic lineages. Our results challenge the accepted paradigm, and show that there is little consistent evidence that lineages of brood parasites have higher speciation or extinction rates than non-parasitic species. However, we provide the first evidence that the evolution of brood parasitic behaviour may affect rates of evolution in morphological traits associated with parasitism. Specifically, egg size and the colour and pattern of plumage have evolved up to nine times faster in parasitic than in non-parasitic cuckoos. Moreover, cuckoo clades of parasitic species that are sympatric (and share similar host genera) exhibit higher rates of phenotypic evolution. This supports the idea that competition for hosts may be linked to the high phenotypic diversity found in parasitic cuckoos.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Ackermann M, 2004, EVOLUTION, V58, P2599
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, PACKAGE CAPER REFERE
  • [3] Egg phenotype differentiation in sympatric cuckoo Cuculus canorus gentes
    Antonov, A.
    Stokke, B. G.
    Vikan, J. R.
    Fossoy, F.
    Ranke, P. S.
    Roskaft, E.
    Moksnes, A.
    Moller, A. P.
    Shykoff, J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2010, 23 (06) : 1170 - 1182
  • [4] WHY ARE CUCKOOS HOST SPECIFIC
    BROOKER, LC
    BROOKER, MG
    [J]. OIKOS, 1990, 57 (03) : 301 - 309
  • [5] Davies N. B., 2000, Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats
  • [6] AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY OF CO-EVOLUTION BETWEEN THE CUCKOO, CUCULUS-CANORUS, AND ITS HOSTS .1. HOST EGG DISCRIMINATION
    DAVIES, NB
    BROOKE, MD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1989, 58 (01) : 207 - 224
  • [7] Social Transmission of a Host Defense Against Cuckoo Parasitism
    Davies, Nicholas B.
    Welbergen, Justin A.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 324 (5932) : 1318 - 1320
  • [8] Del Hoyo J., 2014, Handbook of the Birds of the World
  • [9] BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS - A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION
    EHRLICH, PR
    RAVEN, PH
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 1964, 18 (04) : 586 - 608
  • [10] Inordinate fondness explained: Why are there so many beetles?
    Farrell, BD
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1998, 281 (5376) : 555 - 559