Performance Indicators Framework for Assessment of a Sanitary Sewer System Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

被引:21
作者
Nam, Seong-Nam [1 ]
Nguyen, Thao Thi [1 ]
Oh, Jeill [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 84 Heukseok Ro, Seoul 06974, South Korea
关键词
analytic hierarchy process; performance indicators; sanitary sewer systems; wastewater services; SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3390/su11102746
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, performance indicators (PIs) for assessing services of the sanitary sewer system in South Korea were evaluated based on general opinions collected from experts in the field. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was then carried out. The evaluated set of PIs consisted of five major criteria: management, operation and maintenance, service, environment, and finance. Using the experts' survey incorporated into the AHP tool, the prioritization of the five criteria was performed, consisting of a total of 14 indicators and 34 checklists on three levels. Of the criteria groups, operation and maintenance was found to be the most important indicator, comprising 43% of all the scores. The AHP results showed that, of the 34 checklists, 13 indicators were explained as candidates of key PIs: on-the-job training and work role and responsibility from management, sewer condition inspection, pump, sewer maintenance, flow rate/water quality/odor monitoring from operation and maintenance, complaint resolution from service, inflow volume from environment, and operational cost in annual expenditures from finance. The PIs developed in this study are expected to be used by stakeholders involved in the provision of sewer services, such as undertaking companies, policy-making bodies, and financing agencies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 33 条
[21]  
OFWAT, 2013, Key Performance Indicators-Guidance
[22]   Sustainable development indicators: how are they used in Swedish water utilities? [J].
Palme, Ulrika ;
Tillman, Anne-Marie .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (13) :1346-1357
[23]  
Parmenter D., 2015, Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing and Using Winning KPIs
[24]  
Pietrucha-Urbanik K, 2014, SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK ANALYSIS: BEYOND THE HORIZON, P1115
[25]   Approaches to Failure Risk Analysis of the Water Distribution Network with Regard to the Safety of Consumers [J].
Pietrucha-Urbanik, Katarzyna ;
Tchorzewska-Cieslak, Barbara .
WATER, 2018, 10 (11)
[26]  
Saaty T., 2008, International Journal of Services Sciences, V1, DOI [10.1504/08.17590, DOI 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590, 10.1108/JMTM-03-2014-0020, 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590]
[27]   Time dependent decision-making; dynamic priorities in the AHP/ANP: Generalizing from points to functions and from real to complex variables [J].
Saaty, Thomas L. .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2007, 46 (7-8) :860-891
[28]  
Salvetti M., 2013, P 7 IWA INT C EFF US
[29]   Revising the existing Performance Indicator system for small water supply utilities in Japan [J].
Shinde, Victor Rana ;
Hirayama, Nagahisa ;
Mugita, Ai ;
Itoh, Sadahiko .
URBAN WATER JOURNAL, 2013, 10 (06) :377-393
[30]   A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management [J].
Subramanian, Nachiappan ;
Ramanathan, Ramakrishnan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 138 (02) :215-241