Performance Indicators Framework for Assessment of a Sanitary Sewer System Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

被引:21
作者
Nam, Seong-Nam [1 ]
Nguyen, Thao Thi [1 ]
Oh, Jeill [1 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 84 Heukseok Ro, Seoul 06974, South Korea
关键词
analytic hierarchy process; performance indicators; sanitary sewer systems; wastewater services; SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3390/su11102746
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this study, performance indicators (PIs) for assessing services of the sanitary sewer system in South Korea were evaluated based on general opinions collected from experts in the field. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was then carried out. The evaluated set of PIs consisted of five major criteria: management, operation and maintenance, service, environment, and finance. Using the experts' survey incorporated into the AHP tool, the prioritization of the five criteria was performed, consisting of a total of 14 indicators and 34 checklists on three levels. Of the criteria groups, operation and maintenance was found to be the most important indicator, comprising 43% of all the scores. The AHP results showed that, of the 34 checklists, 13 indicators were explained as candidates of key PIs: on-the-job training and work role and responsibility from management, sewer condition inspection, pump, sewer maintenance, flow rate/water quality/odor monitoring from operation and maintenance, complaint resolution from service, inflow volume from environment, and operational cost in annual expenditures from finance. The PIs developed in this study are expected to be used by stakeholders involved in the provision of sewer services, such as undertaking companies, policy-making bodies, and financing agencies.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Alegre H., 2002, P WORKSH VIEWS EXP G
[2]  
Alegre H., 2006, Performance Indicators for Water Supply Services. IWA Manual of Best Practice, V2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, POP PROJ KOR 2015 20
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, FUNDAMENTALS DECISIO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ENCY BIOSTATISTICS
[6]  
Ashley R., 2002, URBAN WATER, V4, P123
[7]  
AWWA, 2015, Benchmarking Performance Indicators for Water and Wastewater Utilities-2013 Survey Data and Analyses Report
[8]  
Balkema A.J., 2002, URBAN WATER, V4, P153, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00014-6
[9]  
Danilenko A., 2014, IBNET WATER SUPPLY S
[10]  
Fenner R., 2000, URBAN WATER SEWER SY, V2, P343, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00065-0