Instructor Time and Effort in Online and Face-to-Face Teaching: Lessons Learned

被引:32
|
作者
Worley, Wanda L. [1 ]
Tesdell, Lee S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Dept Design & Commun Technol & Tech Commun, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Minnesota State Univ, Mankato, MN 56001 USA
关键词
Distance learning; e-learning; face-to-face (FTF) teaching and learning; higher education; online teaching and learning; pedagogy; technical communication; technical writing; time and effort; web courses;
D O I
10.1109/TPC.2009.2017990
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Results in past studies comparing teaching time and effort in online and face-to face (FTF) teaching environments have been inconsistent. This research study compares the instructional time and effort it took the authors to teach the same course online and FTF in their respective universities. The authors hypothesize that it takes more time to teach online courses. The results of the two-semester study show that both authors spent more time per student, approximately 2040 more, in the online courses. In the total time spent per student online compared to the total time spent per student FTF the paired-samples t-test showed a statistically significant difference (t(3) = 6.163, p = 0.1109). The authors speculate a number of factors contributed to this difference and the perception that teaching in an online environment takes more time and effort than teaching in a FTF environment.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 151
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benefits of Online Teaching for Face-to-Face Teaching at Historically Black Colleges and Universities
    Graham, D'Nita Andrews
    ONLINE LEARNING, 2019, 23 (01): : 144 - 163
  • [2] A comparison of student evaluations of teaching between online and face-to-face courses
    Ohio Christian University, 1476 Lancaster Pike, Circleville, OH USA, 43113, United States
    不详
    Internet Higher Educ, 2007, 2 (89-101): : 89 - 101
  • [3] COMBINING DISTANCE AND FACE-TO-FACE TEACHING AND LEARNING IN SPATIAL COMPUTATIONS
    Gulland, Elizabeth-Kate
    Schut, A. G. T.
    Veenendaal, Bert
    ISPRS WORKSHOP COMMISSIONS VI/1 - VI/2 E-LEARNING 2011 WITHIN ACRS, 2011, 38-6 (W27): : 23 - 28
  • [4] Quantitative study: face-to-face and online teaching of German to polytechnic students
    Lemos, Patricia Rojo
    LENGUAJE Y TEXTOS, 2024, (58): : 129 - 140
  • [5] Incidence of online teaching on face-to-face teaching after the confinement by COVID19
    Aguilera-Jimenez, Antonio
    Erena-Guardia, Gema
    Alcantara-Lazaro, Ana A.
    CAMPUS VIRTUALES, 2024, 13 (02): : 123 - 139
  • [6] TriHy: teaching an MA TESOL class face-to-face, synchronously online, and asynchronously online
    Ildiko Porter-Szucs
    Barry DeCicco
    SN Social Sciences, 2 (8):
  • [7] Our Journey From Face-to-Face to Blended Learning Approach: Important Lessons Learned
    Cheung, Wing Sum
    Hew, Khe Foon
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELEARNING, 2012, : 27 - 31
  • [8] Face-to-Face vs. Online Asynchronous Teaching in a Conservation Biology Course
    Wells, Carrie N.
    Pass, Michelle B.
    Walsh, Jane E.
    ONLINE LEARNING, 2022, 26 (02): : 241 - 253
  • [9] Experimental study comparing face-to-face and online teaching/learning of an English subject
    De Juan Gonzalez, Pilar
    PORTA LINGUARUM, 2019, (32) : 119 - 133
  • [10] Exploring Effects of Online and Face-to-Face Teaching Formats on Students' Interest and Engagement
    Marquardt, Kai
    Happe, Lucia
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 18TH WIPSCE CONFERENCE IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY COMPUTING EDUCATION RESEARCH, WIPSCE 2023, 2023,