Assuring high quality treatment delivery in clinical trials - Results from the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) study 03.04 "RADAR" set-up accuracy study

被引:35
作者
Haworth, Annette [1 ]
Kearvell, Rachel
Greer, Peter B. [2 ]
Hooton, Ben
Denham, James W. [2 ]
Lamb, David [3 ]
Duchesne, Gillian [4 ]
Murray, Judy [3 ]
Joseph, David
机构
[1] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Phys Sci, Melbourne, Vic 8006, Australia
[2] Univ Newcastle, Dept Radiat Oncol, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
[3] Wellington Hosp, Wellington Blood & Canc Ctr, Wellington, New Zealand
[4] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Quality assurance; Clinical trials; Set-up accuracy; Prostate; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; PROSTATE-CANCER; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; MRC RT01; VERIFICATION PROCEDURE; DOSE-RESPONSE; IRRADIATION; THERAPY; ERRORS; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2008.10.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: A multi-centre clinical trial for prostate cancer patients provided an opportunity to introduce conformal radiotherapy with dose escalation. To verify adequate treatment accuracy prior to patient recruitment, centres submitted details of a set-up accuracy study (SUAS). We report the results of the SUAS, the variation in clinical practice and the strategies used to help centres improve treatment accuracy. Materials and methods: The SUAS required each of the 24 participating centres to collect data on at least 10 pelvic patients imaged on a minimum of 20 occasions. Software was provided for data collection and analysis. Support to centres was provided through educational lectures, the trial quality assurance team and an information booklet. Results: Only two centres had recently carried Out a SUAS prior to the trial opening. Systematic errors were generally smaller than those, previously reported in the literature. The questionnaire identified many differences in patient set-up, protocols. As a result of participating in this QA activity more than 65% of centres improved their treatment delivery accuracy. Conclusions: Conducting a pre-trial SUAS has led to improvement in treatment delivery accuracy in many centres. Treatment techniques and set-up accuracy varied greatly, demonstrating a need to ensure an ongoing awareness for such Studies in future trials and with the introduction of dose escalation or new technologies. Crown Copyright (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 90 (2009) 299-306
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 306
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1999, 62 ICRU
  • [2] High-precision prostate cancer irradiation by clinical application of an offline patient setup verification procedure, using portal imaging
    Bel, A
    Vos, PH
    Rodrigus, PTR
    Creutzberg, CL
    Visser, AG
    Stroom, JC
    Lebesque, JV
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (02): : 321 - 332
  • [3] A VERIFICATION PROCEDURE TO IMPROVE PATIENT SET-UP ACCURACY USING PORTAL IMAGES
    BEL, A
    VANHERK, M
    BARTELINK, H
    LEBESQUE, JV
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1993, 29 (02) : 253 - 260
  • [4] Planning target margin calculations for prostate radiotherapy based on intrafraction and interfraction motion using four localization methods
    Beltran, Chris.
    Herman, Michael G.
    Davis, Brian J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 70 (01): : 289 - 295
  • [5] The effects of radiotherapy treatment uncertainties on the delivered dose distribution and tumour control probability
    Booth J.T.
    Zavgorodni S.F.
    [J]. Australasian Physics & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2001, 24 (2): : 71 - 78
  • [6] Electronic portal image assisted reduction of systematic set-up errors in head and neck irradiation
    de Boer, HCJ
    de Koste, JRV
    Creutzberg, CL
    Visser, AG
    Levendag, PC
    Heijmen, BJM
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 61 (03) : 299 - 308
  • [7] A protocol for the reduction of systematic patient setup errors with minimal portal imaging workload
    De Boer, HCJ
    Heijmen, BJM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (05): : 1350 - 1365
  • [8] Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial
    Dearnaley, David P.
    Sydes, Matthew R.
    Graham, John D.
    Aird, Edwin G.
    Bottomley, David
    Cowan, Richard A.
    Huddart, Robert A.
    Jose, Chakiath C.
    Matthews, John H. L.
    Millar, Jeremy
    Moore, A. Rollo
    Morgan, Rachel C.
    Russell, J. Martin
    Scrase, Christopher D.
    Stephens, Richard J.
    Syndikus, Isabel
    Parmar, Mahesh K. B.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (06) : 475 - 487
  • [9] DENHAM J, 1993, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V26, P253
  • [10] MRC RT01: an important trial
    Denham, James W.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (06) : 459 - 460