Effect of Velocity Loss on Strength Performance in Bench Press Using a Weight Stack Machine

被引:16
作者
Rodiles-Guerrero, Luis [1 ]
Pareja-Blanco, Fernando [1 ,2 ]
Antonio Leon-Prados, Juan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pablo de Olavide, Phys Performance & Sports Res Ctr, Ctra Utrera,Km 1, Seville 41013, Spain
[2] Univ Pablo de Olavide, Fac Sport Sci, Dept Sports & Comp Sci, Seville, Spain
关键词
resistance training; velocity-based training; degree of effort; repetition velocity; fatigue; isoinertial assessment; MOVEMENT VELOCITY; PROGRAM VARIABLES; RESISTANCE; GAINS; INTENSITY; VOLUMES; MEN;
D O I
10.1055/a-1179-5849
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
This study aimed to analyze the effects of three different velocity loss thresholds (10 %: VL10, 30 %: VL30 and 50 %: VL50) on maximal strength and velocity at different intensities during bench press using a weight stack machine (WSM-BP). Forty-five men were randomly assigned to three groups: VL10 (n = 15), VL30 (n = 15) and VL50 (n = 15), which followed a 5-week (15 sessions) velocity-based WSM-BP program. Assessments performed Pre- and Post-training included: a) estimated one-repetition maximum (1RM) in WSM-BP; b) average velocity attained against all absolute loads common to Pre- and Post-training tests in WSM-BP; c) average velocity attained against all absolute loads that were lifted equal to or faster than 0.8 m . s(-1) at Pre-training (light loads); and d) average velocity attained against all absolute loads that were lifted slower than 0.8 m . s(-1) at Pre-training (heavy loads). All groups showed significant improvements in 1RM, velocity against all loads, and velocity against heavy loads (P < 0.001-0.01). However, only the VL10 group showed significant enhancements in velocity against light loads (P = 0.05). Therefore, the VL10 group showed a higher training efficiency compared to VL30 and VL50 interventions, since it obtained similar benefits by performing fewer repetitions.
引用
收藏
页码:921 / 928
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Early and late rate of force development: differential adaptive responses to resistance training?
    Andersen, L. L.
    Andersen, J. L.
    Zebis, M. K.
    Aagaard, P.
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS, 2010, 20 (01) : E162 - E169
  • [2] The Minimum Effective Training Dose Required to Increase 1RM Strength in Resistance-Trained Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Androulakis-Korakakis, Patroklos
    Fisher, James P.
    Steele, James
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 50 (04) : 751 - 765
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, SPORTSCIENCE
  • [4] Baechle T.R., 2008, Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning
  • [5] Designing resistance training programmes to enhance muscular fitness - A review of the acute programme variables
    Bird, SP
    Tarpenning, KM
    Marino, FE
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 35 (10) : 841 - 851
  • [6] Effect of Movement Velocity During Resistance Training on Dynamic Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Davies, Timothy B.
    Kuang, Kenny
    Orr, Rhonda
    Halaki, Mark
    Hackett, Daniel
    [J]. SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 47 (08) : 1603 - 1617
  • [7] The time-frame of acute resistance exercise effects on football skill performance: The impact of exercise intensity
    Draganidis, Dimitrios
    Chatzinikolaou, Athanasios
    Jamurtas, Athanasios Z.
    Carlos Barbero, Jose
    Tsoukas, Dimitrios
    Theodorou, Apostolos Spyridon
    Margonis, Konstantinos
    Michailidis, Yannis
    Avloniti, Alexandra
    Theodorou, Anastasios
    Kambas, Antonis
    Fatouros, Ioannis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2013, 31 (07) : 714 - 722
  • [8] Movement Velocity as a Measure of Loading Intensity in Resistance Training
    Gonzalez-Badillo, J. J.
    Sanchez-Medina, L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 31 (05) : 347 - 352
  • [9] González-Badillo JJ, 2006, J STRENGTH COND RES, V20, P73
  • [10] González-Badillo JJ, 2005, J STRENGTH COND RES, V19, P689