Common Method Variance in Advertising Research: When to Be Concerned and How to Control for It

被引：198
|
作者：
Malhotra, Naresh K. [1 ,2 ]
Schaller, Tracey King [3 ]
Patil, Ashutosh [4 ]
机构：
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Georgia Tech CIBER, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Scheller Coll Business, 800 West Peachtree St NW, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA
[3] Georgia Gwinnett Coll, Sch Business, Mkt, Lawrenceville, GA USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Robert J Trulaske Sr Coll Business, Mkt, Columbia, MO USA
来源：
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING | 2017年 / 46卷 / 01期
关键词：
SELF-REPORTED AFFECT; MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRICES; ASSESSING CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; CFA MARKER TECHNIQUE; METHOD BIAS; ORGANIZATIONAL-RESEARCH; BIG; PROCEDURAL REMEDIES; BEHAVIOR RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGNS;
D O I：
10.1080/00913367.2016.1252287
中图分类号：
F [经济];
学科分类号：
02 ;
摘要：
In this article we discuss and analyze the critical issues related to common method variance (CMV) that are particularly relevant to advertising research and recommend best practices for assessing the effects of CMV in this domain. Specifically, we cover the development of CMV as a domain-specific methodological concern and the underlying sources of CMV that are likely to operate in cross-sectional survey-based studies in the field of advertising. We discuss in detail the available procedural and statistical techniques that can be applied to control for and/or measure the effects of sources of CMV in a single study and across research domains. In addition, we provide a critical look at how these techniques have been employed in past research and make recommendations for future examinations of CMV in advertising research.
引用
收藏
页码：193 / 212
页数：20
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Editorial: How to Prevent, Detect and Control Common Method Variance in Electronic Commerce Research
    Rodriguez-Ardura, Inma
    Meseguer-Artola, Antoni
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (02): : I - V
  • [2] Methodological threat or myth? Evaluating the current state of evidence on common method variance in human resource management research
    Bozionelos, Nikos
    Simmering, Marcia J.
    HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2022, 32 (01) : 194 - 215
  • [3] Alternative Techniques for Assessing Common Method Variance: An Analysis of the Theory of Planned Behavior Research
    Schaller, Tracey King
    Patil, Ashutosh
    Malhotra, Naresh K.
    ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2015, 18 (02) : 177 - 206
  • [4] Dealing with Common Method Variance in International Marketing Research
    Baumgartner, Hans
    Weijters, Bert
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MARKETING, 2021, 29 (03) : 7 - 22
  • [5] From the Editors: Common method variance in international business research
    Chang, Sea-Jin
    van Witteloostuijn, Arjen
    Eden, Lorraine
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2010, 41 (02) : 178 - 184
  • [6] Addressing common method variance and endogeneity in vocational behavior research: A review of the literature and suggestions for future research
    Cooper, Brian
    Eva, Nathan
    Fazlelahi, Forough Zarea
    Newman, Alexander
    Lee, Allan
    Obschonka, Martin
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2020, 121
  • [7] Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It
    Podsakoff, Philip M.
    MacKenzie, Scott B.
    Podsakoff, Nathan P.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 63, 2012, 63 : 539 - 569
  • [8] Critical Review of the Literature and Current Tendencies of the Common Method Variance in Sport Management Research
    Kaltsonoudi, Kalliope
    Tsigilis, Nikolaos
    Karteroliotis, Konstantinos
    MEASUREMENT IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND EXERCISE SCIENCE, 2022, 26 (02) : 103 - 115
  • [9] Exploring Common Method Variance in Analytics Research in the Indian Context: A Comparative Study with Known Techniques
    Saxena, Mansi
    Bagga, Teena
    Gupta, Sangeeta
    Kaushik, Neeraj
    FIIB BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024, 13 (05) : 553 - 569
  • [10] On the Efficacy of Psychological Separation to Address Common Method Variance: Experimental Evidence and a Guiding Research Design Framework
    Rubenstein, Alex L.
    Simon, Lauren S.
    Kammeyer-Mueller, John D.
    Corwin, Emily S.
    Morrison, Hayley M.
    Whiting, Steven W.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2025,
123