Clinical global impression of change in physical frailty: Development of a measure based on clinical judgment

被引:173
作者
Studenski, S
Hayes, RP
Leibowitz, RQ
Bode, R
Lavery, L
Walston, J
Duncan, P
Perera, S
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Med, Div Geriatr, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Eli Lilly & Co, Res Dept, Global Hlth Outcomes, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[3] Audie Murphy Vet Affairs, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[6] Univ Florida, Sch Hlth Profess, Dept Hlth Serv Adm, Gainesville, FL USA
[7] Univ Kansas, Ctr Aging, Kansas City, KS USA
[8] Univ Kansas, Dept Prevent Med, Kansas City, KS USA
关键词
frailty; clinical global impression of change; measurement; aging;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52423.x
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives: To expand the ability to assess physical frailty by developing a Clinical Global Impression of Change in Physical Frailty (CGIC-PF) instrument. Design: Qualitative and quantitative instrument development. Setting: Academic centers. Participants: Six expert panel members, 46 clinicians, 24 patients, and 12 caregivers. Measurements: Literature review and structured group processes with experts, clinicians, and consumers were used to generate an initial list of domains and indicators. Structured interviews with clinical experts in the area of frailty were used to establish relevance and feasibility of measurement of domains. Interrater reliability was assessed through a Web-based study. Geriatricians pilot tested the feasibility of the baseline CGIC-PF with 10 patients. Results: The CGIC-PF includes six intrinsic domains (mobility, balance, strength, endurance, nutrition, and neuromotor performance) and seven consequences domains (medical complexity, healthcare utilization, appearance, self-perceived health, activities of daily living, emotional status, and social status). Each domain has two to four clinical indicators. Change is scored on a 7-point scale from markedly worse to markedly improved. Average interrater reliability of the CGIC-PF for the Web-based cases was 0.97. Geriatricians completed a baseline CGIC-PF on their own patients in 10 minutes or less. Conclusion: The CGIC-PF is a structured assessment of change in physical frailty with defined content and process. It has strong face validity, reliability, and feasibility for use in clinical research. It may be useful as one criterion of change and as an anchor for change in other measures.
引用
收藏
页码:1560 / 1566
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Sarcopenia, weight loss, and nutritional frailty in the elderly
    Bales, CW
    Ritchie, CS
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF NUTRITION, 2002, 22 : 309 - 323
  • [2] A conceptual framework of frailty: A review
    Bortz, WM
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 57 (05): : M283 - M288
  • [3] An Investigation of the Sources of Measurement Error in the Post-Encounter Written Scores from Standardized Patient Examinations
    Boulet, Jack R.
    Ben-David, Miriam Friedman
    Hambleton, Ronald K.
    Burdick, William
    Ziv, Amitai
    Gary, Nancy E.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 1998, 3 (02) : 89 - 100
  • [4] Physical and performance measures for the identification of mild to moderate frailty
    Brown, M
    Sinacore, DR
    Binder, EF
    Kohrt, WM
    [J]. JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2000, 55 (06): : M350 - M355
  • [5] Buchner D M, 1992, Clin Geriatr Med, V8, P1
  • [6] Unstable disability and the fluctuations of frailty
    Campbell, AJ
    Buchner, DM
    [J]. AGE AND AGEING, 1997, 26 (04) : 315 - 318
  • [7] What is a clinically meaningful change on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire? Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study 5592
    Cella, D
    Eton, DT
    Fairclough, DL
    Bonomi, P
    Heyes, AE
    Silberman, C
    Wolf, MK
    Johnson, DH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (03) : 285 - 295
  • [8] Delbecq AL., 1975, Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Techniques
  • [9] Review of outcome measurement instruments in Alzheimer's disease drug trials: Introduction
    Demers, L
    Oremus, M
    Perrault, A
    Wolfson, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROLOGY, 2000, 13 (04) : 161 - 169
  • [10] FEINSTEIN A.R., 1987, CLINIMETRICS