Predicted osteotomy planes are accurate when using patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in cadavers: a descriptive analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Kievit, A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Dobbe, J. G. G. [3 ]
Streekstra, G. J. [3 ]
Blankevoort, L. [1 ]
Schafroth, M. U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Orthopaed Res Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Orthopaed Surg,Amsterdam Movement Sci, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Tergooi Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Hilversum, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Engn & Phys, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Total knee arthroplasty; Biomet Signature; patient-specific instrumentation; Accuracy study; 3D Analysis; CT; REPLACEMENT; NAVIGATION; GUIDES; ALIGNMENT; SURGERY; SYSTEM; TKA;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-017-4721-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Malalignment of implants is a major source of failure during total knee arthroplasty. To achieve more accurate 3D planning and execution of the osteotomy cuts during surgery, the Signature (Biomet, Warsaw) patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was used to produce pin guides for the positioning of the osteotomy blocks by means of computer-aided manufacture based on CT scan images. The research question of this study is: what is the transfer accuracy of osteotomy planes predicted by the Signature PSI system for preoperative 3D planning and intraoperative block-guided pin placement to perform total knee arthroplasty procedures? The transfer accuracy achieved by using the Signature PSI system was evaluated by comparing the osteotomy planes predicted preoperatively with the osteotomy planes seen intraoperatively in human cadaveric legs. Outcomes were measured in terms of translational and rotational errors (varus, valgus, flexion, extension and axial rotation) for both tibia and femur osteotomies. Average translational errors between the osteotomy planes predicted using the Signature system and the actual osteotomy planes achieved was 0.8 mm (+/- 0.5 mm) for the tibia and 0.7 mm (+/- 4.0 mm) for the femur. Average rotational errors in relation to predicted and achieved osteotomy planes were 0.1A degrees (+/- 1.2A degrees) of varus and 0.4A degrees (+/- 1.7A degrees) of anterior slope (extension) for the tibia, and 2.8A degrees (+/- 2.0A degrees) of varus and 0.9A degrees (+/- 2.7A degrees) of flexion and 1.4A degrees (+/- 2.2A degrees) of external rotation for the femur. The similarity between osteotomy planes predicted using the Signature system and osteotomy planes actually achieved was excellent for the tibia although some discrepancies were seen for the femur. The use of 3D system techniques in TKA surgery can provide accurate intraoperative guidance, especially for patients with deformed bone, tailored to individual patients and ensure better placement of the implant.
引用
收藏
页码:1751 / 1758
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-specific instrumentation and custom total knee implants in total knee arthroplasty
    Isaacson, Mark
    Bunn, Kevin
    Incavo, Stephen
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2015, 26 (03): : 224 - 227
  • [22] Accuracy and Reproducibility Using Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Ankle Arthroplasty
    Daigre, Justin
    Berlet, Gregory
    Van Dyke, Bryan
    Peterson, Kyle S.
    Santrock, Robert
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 38 (04) : 412 - 418
  • [23] Design improvement in patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty improved the accuracy of the tibial prosthetic alignment in the coronal and axial planes
    Yamamura, Kazumasa
    Minoda, Yukihide
    Sugama, Ryo
    Ohta, Yoichi
    Nakamura, Suguru
    Ueyama, Hideki
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2020, 28 (05) : 1560 - 1567
  • [24] Improved Radiographic Outcomes With Patient-Specific Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Ivie, Conrad B.
    Probst, Patrick J.
    Bal, Amrit K.
    Stannard, James T.
    Crist, Brett D.
    Bal, B. Sonny
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (11) : 2100 - 2103
  • [25] Assessing the accuracy of patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty
    Seon, Jong-Keun
    Park, Hyeong-Won
    Yoo, Seung-Hyun
    Song, Eun-Kyoo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (11) : 3678 - 3683
  • [26] Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty Provides No Improvement in Component Alignment
    Stronach, Benjamin M.
    Pelt, Christopher E.
    Erickson, Jill A.
    Peters, Christopher L.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (09) : 1705 - 1708
  • [27] The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty
    Chen, Jerry Yongqiang
    Yeo, Seng Jin
    Yew, Andy Khye Soon
    Tay, Darren Keng Jin
    Chia, Shi-Lu
    Lo, Ngai Nung
    Chin, Pak Lin
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (03) : 630 - 635
  • [28] Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation
    Parratte, Sebastien
    Blanc, Guillaume
    Boussemart, Thomas
    Ollivier, Matthieu
    Le Corroller, Thomas
    Argenson, Jean-Noel
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2013, 21 (10) : 2213 - 2219
  • [29] Patient-Specific Instrumentation Affects Perioperative Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Cucchi, Davide
    Menon, Alessandra
    Zanini, Beatrice
    Compagnoni, Riccardo
    Ferrua, Paolo
    Randelli, Pietro
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (06) : 483 - 489
  • [30] Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
    Kosse, Nienke M.
    Heesterbeek, Petra J. C.
    Schimmel, Janneke J. P.
    van Hellemondt, Gijs G.
    Wymenga, Ate B.
    Defoort, Koen C.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2018, 26 (06) : 1792 - 1799