An in vitro biofilm model associated to dental implants: Structural and quantitative analysis of in vitro biofilm formation on different dental implant surfaces

被引:93
作者
Sanchez, M. C. [1 ]
Llama-Palacios, A. [1 ]
Fernandez, E. [1 ]
Figuero, E. [1 ]
Marin, M. J. [1 ]
Leon, R. [2 ]
Blanc, V. [2 ]
Herrera, D. [3 ]
Sanz, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense, Lab Dent Res, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[2] Dentaid SA, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Complutense, ETEP Etiol & Therapy Periodontal Dis Res Grp, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
关键词
Pen-implant biofilm; Zirconium; Titanium; Hydroxyapatite; LTSEM; CLSM; qPCR; REAL-TIME PCR; BACTERIAL ADHESION; PERIODONTAL PATHOGENS; SUBGINGIVAL BIOFILM; TITANIUM; COLONIZATION; VIVO; SUPRAGINGIVAL; HEALTHY; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. The impact of implant surfaces in dental biofilm development is presently unknown. The aim of this investigation was to assess in vitro the development of a complex biofilm model on titanium and zirconium implant surfaces, and to compare it with the same biofilm formed on hydroxyapatite surface. Methods. Six standard reference strains were used to develop an in vitro biofilm over sterile titanium, zirconium and hydroxyapatite discs, coated with saliva within the wells of pre-sterilized polystyrene tissue culture plates. The selected species used represent initial (Streptococcus oralis and Actinomyces naeslundii), early (Veillonella parvula), secondary (Fusobacterium nucleatum) and late colonizers (Porphyromonas gingivalis and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans). The developed biofilms (growth time 1 to 120h) were studied with confocal laser scanning microscopy using a vital fluorescence technique and with lowtemperature scanning electron microscopy. The number (colony forming units/biofilm) and kinetics of the bacteria within the biofilm were studied with quantitative PCR (qPCR). As outcome variables, the biofilm thickness, the percentage of cell vitality and the number of bacteria were compared using the analysis of variance. Results. The bacteria adhered and matured within the biofilm over the three surfaces with similar dynamics. Different surfaces, however, demonstrated differences both in the thickness, deposition of the extracellular polysaccharide matrix as well as in the organization of the bacterial cells. Signcance. While the formation and dynamics of an in vitro biofilm model was similar irrespective of the surface of inoculation (hydroxyapatite, titanium or zirconium), there were significant differences in regards to the biofilm thickness and three-dimensional structure. (C) 2014 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1161 / 1171
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Surface properties of titanium and zirconia dental implant materials and their effect on bacterial adhesion [J].
Al-Radha, Afya Sahib Diab ;
Dymock, David ;
Younes, Charles ;
O'Sullivan, Dominic .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2012, 40 (02) :146-153
[2]   Characterization and application of a flow system for in vitro multispecies oral biofilm formation [J].
Blanc, V. ;
Isabal, S. ;
Sanchez, M. C. ;
Llama-Palacios, A. ;
Herrera, D. ;
Sanz, M. ;
Leon, R. .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH, 2014, 49 (03) :323-332
[3]   Periodontal pathogens: A quantitative comparison of anaerobic culture and real-time PCR [J].
Boutaga, K ;
van Winkelhoff, AJ ;
Vandenbroucke-Grauls, CMJE ;
Savelkoul, PHM .
FEMS IMMUNOLOGY AND MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (02) :191-199
[4]   Comparison of real-time PCR and culture for detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis in subgingival plaque samples [J].
Boutaga, K ;
van Winkelhoff, AJ ;
Vandenbroucke-Grauls, CMJE ;
Savelkoul, PHM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (11) :4950-4954
[5]   In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces [J].
Buergers, Ralf ;
Gerlach, Till ;
Hahnel, Sebastian ;
Schwarz, Frank ;
Handel, Gerhard ;
Gosau, Martin .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (02) :156-164
[6]   Biofilm Formation on Dental Restorative and Implant Materials [J].
Busscher, H. J. ;
Rinastiti, M. ;
Siswomihardjo, W. ;
van der Mei, H. C. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2010, 89 (07) :657-665
[7]   RETRACTED: Bacterial adhesion and colonization differences between zirconia and titanium implant abutments: an in vivo human study (Retracted Article) [J].
de Oliveira, Greison Rabelo ;
Pozzer, Leandro ;
Cavalieri-Pereira, Lucas ;
de Moraes, Paulo Hemerson ;
Olate, Sergio ;
de Albergaria Barbosa, Jose Ricardo .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2012, 42 (06) :217-223
[8]   Bacterial adhesion on the titanium and zirconia abutment surfaces [J].
do Nascimento, Cassio ;
Pita, Murillo Sucena ;
Nogueira, Flavio Henrique ;
Fernandes, Carrico ;
Pedrazzi, Vinicius ;
de Albuquerque Junior, Rubens Ferreira ;
Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (03) :337-343
[9]   Bacterial colonization immediately after installation on oral titanium implants [J].
Fuerst, Mirjam M. ;
Salvi, Giovanni E. ;
Lang, Niklaus P. ;
Persson, G. Rutger .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2007, 18 (04) :501-508
[10]   Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants: a histological and histomorphometrical study in the maxilla of pigs [J].
Gahlert, M. ;
Roehling, S. ;
Wieland, M. ;
Sprecher, C. M. ;
Kniha, H. ;
Milz, S. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (11) :1247-1253