Australian parents' experiences of speech generating device (SGD) service delivery

被引:36
作者
Anderson, Kate [1 ]
Balandin, Susan [2 ]
Stancliffe, Roger [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Discipline Speech Pathol, Fac Hlth Sci, Lidcombe 1825, Australia
[2] Deakin Univ, Fac Hlth, Geelong, Vic 3217, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Ctr Disabil Res & Policy, Lidcombe 1825, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Augmentative and alternative communication; speech generating device; parents; service delivery; family-centred practice; ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE PATHOLOGISTS; SEVERE DISABILITIES; AAC INTERVENTIONS; CHILDREN; PERCEPTIONS; NEEDS; PERSPECTIVES; ENVIRONMENT; FAMILIES;
D O I
10.3109/17518423.2013.857735
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To explore parents' perceptions of existing support for families with a new speech generating device (SGD). Method: Six Australian parents of school-aged children who used an SGD participated in semi-structured interviews about their experiences of SGD support. Data were explored and compared using narrative analysis. Results: Participants discussed barriers to service access, including long waiting lists, service exclusion policies and limited therapist expertise in SGD practice. They emphasized the value of ongoing service coordination for families. Finally, participants discussed the nature of role boundaries and responsibilities for parents vs. therapists in the intervention process and the impact that intervention approaches had on parent autonomy, empowerment and confidence. Conclusion: Having an SGD at home generates ongoing support needs, which had not been well met for some parents in our study. Results suggest that timely, well coordinated and family-centred support may enhance service experience for families with a new device.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 83
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Anderson K, 2013, TRAINING FAMIL UNPUB
[2]  
Anderson K, 2013, PARENTS VIEWS UNPUB
[3]  
Anderson K, 2012, INT J TELEREHABILITA, V4, P79, DOI [10.5195/ijt.2012.6106, 10.5195/IJT.2012.6106]
[4]  
Angelo D., 1995, Augmentative and Alternative Communication, V11, P193
[5]  
Angelo D.H., 2000, AUGMENT ALTERN COMM, V16, P37, DOI DOI 10.1080/07434610012331278894
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences
[7]   Family members' perceptions of augmentative and alternative communication device use [J].
Bailey, RL ;
Parette, HP ;
Stoner, LB ;
Angell, ME ;
Carroll, K .
LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2006, 37 (01) :50-60
[8]  
Balandin S., 1998, AAC Augmentative and Alternative Communication, V14, P239, DOI [DOI 10.1080/07434619812331278416, https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619812331278416]
[9]   Barriers and facilitators to the use of high-technology augmentative and alternative communication devices: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis [J].
Baxter, Susan ;
Enderby, Pam ;
Evans, Philippa ;
Judge, Simon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2012, 47 (02) :115-129
[10]  
Bercow J., 2008, BERCOW REPORT REV SE