Using Landsat data to determine land use changes in Datong basin, China

被引:41
作者
Sun, Ziyong [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Rui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Yanxin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Environm Studies, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, MOE Key Lab Biogeol & Environm Geol, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Geol Sci, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY | 2009年 / 57卷 / 08期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Land use; Remote sensing; Image classification; Change detection; China; COVER CLASSIFICATION; ACCURACY; DYNAMICS; PATTERN; GROWTH; AREA; GIS;
D O I
10.1007/s00254-008-1470-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine land use changes in Datong basin using multitemporal Landsat data for the period of 1977-2006. Four dates of Landsat images from 1977, 1990, 2000, and 2006 were selected to classify the study area. Based on the supervised classification method of maximum likelihood algorithm, images were classified into six classes: water, urban, forest, agriculture, wetland, and barren land. A multidate postclassification comparison change detection algorithm was used to determine changes in land use in four intervals. It is found that (1) urban land area increased 213% due to urbanization that resulted from rapid increase of urban population and high-speed economic development, (2) agriculture area increased 34.0% due to land reclamation that resulted from rapid increase of rural population and improvement of irrigation capacity, (3) forest area decreased 20.9% due to deforestation for urban area and agricultural use, (4) barren land area decreased 78.2% due to cultivation for agricultural use, and (5) water and wetland decreased 39.1 and 67.1%, respectively, due to exploitation of surface water and decrease of recharge from groundwater to surface water that resulted from over exploitation of groundwater.
引用
收藏
页码:1825 / 1837
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Urban land-cover change analysis in Central Puget Sound [J].
Alberti, M ;
Weeks, R ;
Coe, S .
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 70 (09) :1043-1052
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ERDAS Field Guide, V5th
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 48 IGBP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1976, DEVELOPMENT, DOI DOI 10.3133/PP964,28-28
[5]  
[Anonymous], BIOMETRICS
[6]  
CHEN ZJ, 2007, RESOUR DEV MARKET, V23, P898
[7]  
Congalton R.G., 2019, Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices
[8]   A REVIEW OF ASSESSING THE ACCURACY OF CLASSIFICATIONS OF REMOTELY SENSED DATA [J].
CONGALTON, RG .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1991, 37 (01) :35-46
[9]   Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review [J].
Coppin, P ;
Jonckheere, I ;
Nackaerts, K ;
Muys, B ;
Lambin, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 25 (09) :1565-1596
[10]  
Crist E.P., 1986, INT GEOSCIENCE REMOT, V2, P1465