Cost-benefit evolution for concentrated solar power in China

被引:46
作者
Ren Ling-zhi [1 ,2 ]
Zhao Xin-gang [1 ,2 ]
Yu Xin-xuan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Yu-zhuo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Beijing Key Lab New Energy & Low Carbon Dev, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
Cost-benefit; Levelized cost of energy; Concentrated solar power; THERMAL-ENERGY STORAGE; LEVELIZED COST; ELECTRICITY; PLANTS; CSP; LCOE; PV; TECHNOLOGIES; FEASIBILITY; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.059
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The prospective cost-benefit of CSP (concentrated solar power) is the attention focus for policy-making and investment decisions. In order to analyze cost-benefit evolution of CSP, the paper adopted the net present value and discounted cash flows techniques to develop a mathematical model, and calculated LCOE (levelized cost of energy) of CSP between 2018 and 2050 by taking the CSP industry of China as an example. The results show that: Firstly, CSP has a large potential in the LCOE reduction, and the values of parabolic trough and solar tower CSP systems reduce by 46%-57% and 47%-56% from 2018 to 2050, respectively. Secondly, predicted evolution for the LCOE of CSP strongly depends, not only on the cumulative installed capacity determined by the specific growth paths of Blue Map and Roadmap Scenarios, but also on the learning curves impacted by technical progress and experience accumulation. Thirdly, to select the sites with higher direct normal irradiation and land cost exemption is crucial to improve cost benefit evolution of CSP. Lastly, the expected returns (i.e. discount rate) have important effect on the LCOE evolution of CSP, high expected returns lead to high the LCOE, and vice versa. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 482
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CURRENT FUTURE COSTS
[2]  
[Anonymous], CONC SOL POW GLOB OU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Technology Roadmap: Concentrating Solar Power
[4]   Technical feasibility of a sustainable Concentrated Solar Power in Morocco through an energy analysis [J].
Bouhal, T. ;
Agrouaz, Y. ;
Kousksou, T. ;
Allouhi, A. ;
El Rhafiki, T. ;
Jamil, A. ;
Bakkas, M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 81 :1087-1095
[5]   Investigation of solar parabolic trough power plants with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system) using thermic oil and solar salt [J].
Boukelia, T. E. ;
Mecibah, M. S. ;
Kumar, B. N. ;
Reddy, K. S. .
ENERGY, 2015, 88 :292-303
[6]   Optimization, selection and feasibility study of solar parabolic trough power plants for Algerian conditions [J].
Boukelia, T. E. ;
Mecibah, M. S. ;
Kumar, B. N. ;
Reddy, K. S. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 101 :450-459
[7]   A review of solar photovoltaic levelized cost of electricity [J].
Branker, K. ;
Pathak, M. J. M. ;
Pearce, J. M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (09) :4470-4482
[8]   Economic impact of solar thermal electricity deployment in Spain [J].
Caldes, N. ;
Varela, M. ;
Santamaria, M. ;
Saez, R. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (05) :1628-1636
[9]   Concentrating solar thermal power as a viable alternative in China's electricity supply [J].
Chien, John Chung-Ling ;
Lior, Noam .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (12) :7622-7636
[10]  
China National Renewable Energy Centre (CNREC), 2014, CHIN REN EN DEV ROAD