Ranking generalized fuzzy numbers based on centroid and rank index

被引:38
作者
Chi, Ha Thi Xuan [1 ]
Yu, Vincent F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, VNU HCM, Quarter 6, Thu Duc Dist, Hcmc, Vietnam
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Management, 43,Sect 4,Keelung Rd, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
关键词
Generalized fuzzy number; Ranking method; Centroid point; Height of fuzzy number; Decision maker's optimisma; TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS; REVISED METHOD; MODEL; AREA; SET;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.050
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Ranking fuzzy numbers is an increasingly important research issue in decision making, because it provides support for decision makers to select the best alternative under an uncertain environment. The recent ranking approach for generalized fuzzy numbers by Kumar et al. (Soft Computing, 15(7): 1373-1381,2011) suffers from common shortcomings associated with discrimination, loss of information, and the inability to distinguish a group of fuzzy numbers. This study is divided into three stages. The first stage indicates the shortcomings through three cases: a group of four overlapping fuzzy numbers, two fuzzy numbers in a certain case, and fuzzy numbers that have the same mode but of different height. The second stage proposes an extended ranking approach for generalized fuzzy numbers integrating the concepts of centroid point, rank index value, height of a fuzzy number, and the degree of the decision maker's optimism. The third stage investigates the three above-mentioned cases and the identical centroid point of two fuzzy numbers by the proposed method and compares them with previous studies. The results show that the proposed approach overcomes the above-mentioned shortcomings and provides a consistent ranking order for decision makers. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 292
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance [J].
Abbasbandy, S. ;
Asady, B. .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2006, 176 (16) :2405-2416
[2]   A new approach for ranking of trapezoidal fuzzy numbers [J].
Abbasbandy, S. ;
Hajjari, T. .
COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 57 (03) :413-419
[3]   Comparative State-of-the-Art Survey of Classical Fuzzy Set and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in Multi-Criteria Decision Making [J].
Afful-Dadzie, Eric ;
Oplatkova, Zuzana Kominkova ;
Prieto, Luis Antonio Beltran .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 19 (03) :726-738
[4]   Ranking fuzzy numbers by distance minimization [J].
Asady, B. ;
Zendehnam, A. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2007, 31 (11) :2589-2598
[5]   Revision of distance minimization method for ranking of fuzzy numbers [J].
Asady, B. .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (03) :1306-1313
[6]   The revised method of ranking LR fuzzy number based on deviation degree [J].
Asady, B. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (07) :5056-5060
[7]   Green supplier selection using fuzzy group decision making methods: A case study from the agri-food industry [J].
Banaeian, Narges ;
Mobli, Hossein ;
Fahimnia, Behnam ;
Nielsen, Izabela Ewa ;
Omid, Mahmoud .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2018, 89 :337-347
[8]   Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Model for Ranking the Agricultural Water Demand Management Strategies in Arid Areas [J].
Banihabib, Mohammad Ebrahim ;
Shabestari, Mohammad Hadi .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2017, 31 (01) :495-513
[9]   A new method to rank fuzzy numbers using Dempster-Shafer theory with fuzzy targets [J].
Chai, Kok Chin ;
Tay, Kai Meng ;
Lim, Chee Peng .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 346 :302-317
[10]  
Chen S.H., 1985, TAMKANG J MANAG SCI, V6, P13