Predicting tensile-shear strength of nugget using M5P model tree and random forest: An analysis

被引:13
作者
Dang, Subrat Kumar [1 ]
Singh, Kulwant [1 ]
机构
[1] St Longowal Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Longowal, Punjab, India
关键词
Tensile-shear strength prediction; Machine-learning; Random forest (RFs); M5P model tree; Resistance spot welding (RSW); SPOT-WELDING PROCESS; FEATURE-SELECTION; MACHINE; OPTIMIZATION; STEEL; ALGORITHMS; DIAMETER; SYSTEMS; JOINTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compind.2020.103345
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Predicting the outcomes of a weld based on few metals with respect to its process parameters is a trivial phenomenon. However, the prediction requires complex mathematical formulation when the number of metals grows. The exponential rise in testing data of welding components in recent time, have increased the data inconsistency and complexity by manifolds. Further, the multi-physical characteristic of welding data adds to its chaotic nature. This makes manual or simulation-based extraction of useful information from welded data extremely challenging. Developing predictive models for tensile-shear strength of Resistance Spot Welding (RSW) is highly latency-bound. The recent success of machine learning approaches in variety of fields gives us motivation to address this issue. In this paper, we proposed a machine learning model inspired from random forest (RF) which predicts the tensile-shear strength of nugget from its input parameters and large number of metals. We trained the prediction model using data from 435 spot-welding cases and compared its performance with widely used M5P model tree. For all cases, RF-based prediction model outperforms the M5P model in terms of accuracy. Four different feature extraction techniques namely manual feature selection, correlation attribute eval., classification attribute eval., and reliefF attribute eval. were investigated to improve the performance of random forest model. From these methods, when model is very complex i.e. higher training size, classification attribute eval. provides greater accuracy with RMSE Test of 0.5442. Moreover, no overfitting and underfitting was observed in this prediction. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   Data-driven Weld Nugget Width Prediction with Decision Tree Algorithm [J].
Ahmed, Fahim ;
Kim, Kyoung-Yun .
45TH SME NORTH AMERICAN MANUFACTURING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (NAMRC 45), 2017, 10 :1009-1019
[2]   Suite of decision tree-based classification algorithms on cancer gene expression data [J].
Al Snousy, Mohmad Badr ;
El-Deeb, Hesham Mohamed ;
Badran, Khaled ;
Al Khlil, Ibrahim Ali .
EGYPTIAN INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2011, 12 (02) :73-82
[3]  
[Anonymous], NTELLIGENT AUTOM SOF, V9, P259
[4]  
Aziz S, 2019, PALGR ST DIG BUS ENA, P33, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-02330-0_3
[5]   Selection of relevant features and examples in machine learning [J].
Blum, AL ;
Langley, P .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1997, 97 (1-2) :245-271
[6]   Data mining in resistance spot welding: A non-destructive method to predict the welding spot diameter by monitoring process parameters [J].
Boersch, Ingo ;
Fuessel, Uwe ;
Gresch, Christoph ;
Grossmann, Christoph ;
Hoffmann, Benjamin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 99 (5-8) :1085-1099
[7]  
Breiman Leo., 2019, Random Forests, P1
[8]  
Brijesh V., 2017, INT J SCI RES, V6, P705, DOI [10,21275/art20164082., DOI 10.21275/ART20164082]
[9]  
Brunelli L, 2019, PROCEDIA MANUF, V38, P248, DOI [10.1016/j.promig,2020,01.011., DOI 10.1016/J.PROMIG.2020.01.033]
[10]  
Butt A., 2016, OPTIMIZATION SPOT WE, P1