How far does it feel? Construal level and decisions under risk

被引:45
作者
Raue, Martina [1 ]
Streicher, Bernhard [1 ]
Lermer, Eva [1 ]
Frey, Dieter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Psychol, D-80802 Munich, Germany
关键词
Construal level; Psychological distance; Risk; Decision making; Framing; Prospect theory; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE; PROSPECT-THEORY; REGULATORY FOCUS; JUDGMENT; REPRESENTATION; DISCREPANCIES; PREDICTION; PERCEPTION; OTHERS; FRAMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research has shown that framing decisions as gains or losses distorts human judgment. Human judgment is also assumed to be influenced by the actual level of construal. Whether decisions are construed in a more detailed manner (low level construal) or in a more abstract manner (high level construal) can depend on perceived psychological distance. In the present studies, we examined the influence of framing and psychological distance on risk taking. In three studies with students (n = 65), physicians (n = 60), and hotel managers (n = 39), we found evidence that construal level influences risk seeking in gain situations, but not in loss situations. Furthermore, the framing effect could be replicated in psychologically close situations, and was eliminated (Studies 1 and 2) or reversed (Study 3) in psychologically distant situations. Our findings illuminate the interplay of framing and construal level, and points out their applicability in organizational decision making. (C) 2014 Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 264
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[51]  
Streicher B., 2012, 7 NAT SCI FDN NSF DT
[52]  
THALER R, 1992, WINNERS CURSE PARADO, P81
[53]   Prospect theory or construal level theory? Diminishing sensitivity vs. psychological distance in risky decisions [J].
Trautmann, Stefan T. ;
van de Kuilen, Gijs .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2012, 139 (01) :254-260
[54]   Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior [J].
Trope, Yaacov ;
Liberman, Nira ;
Wakslak, Cheryl .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 17 (02) :83-95
[55]   Construal-Level Theory of Psychological Distance [J].
Trope, Yaacov ;
Liberman, Nira .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2010, 117 (02) :440-463
[56]   THE FRAMING OF DECISIONS AND THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CHOICE [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
SCIENCE, 1981, 211 (4481) :453-458
[57]   ADVANCES IN PROSPECT-THEORY - CUMULATIVE REPRESENTATION OF UNCERTAINTY [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1992, 5 (04) :297-323
[58]   JUDGMENT UNDER UNCERTAINTY - HEURISTICS AND BIASES [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
SCIENCE, 1974, 185 (4157) :1124-1131
[59]  
Wakslak C. J, 2006, KNEE DEEP BIG UNPUB
[60]   The Effect of Construal Level on Subjective Probability Estimates [J].
Wakslak, Cheryl ;
Trope, Yaacov .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (01) :52-58