How far does it feel? Construal level and decisions under risk

被引:45
作者
Raue, Martina [1 ]
Streicher, Bernhard [1 ]
Lermer, Eva [1 ]
Frey, Dieter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Psychol, D-80802 Munich, Germany
关键词
Construal level; Psychological distance; Risk; Decision making; Framing; Prospect theory; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTANCE; PROSPECT-THEORY; REGULATORY FOCUS; JUDGMENT; REPRESENTATION; DISCREPANCIES; PREDICTION; PERCEPTION; OTHERS; FRAMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.09.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research has shown that framing decisions as gains or losses distorts human judgment. Human judgment is also assumed to be influenced by the actual level of construal. Whether decisions are construed in a more detailed manner (low level construal) or in a more abstract manner (high level construal) can depend on perceived psychological distance. In the present studies, we examined the influence of framing and psychological distance on risk taking. In three studies with students (n = 65), physicians (n = 60), and hotel managers (n = 39), we found evidence that construal level influences risk seeking in gain situations, but not in loss situations. Furthermore, the framing effect could be replicated in psychologically close situations, and was eliminated (Studies 1 and 2) or reversed (Study 3) in psychologically distant situations. Our findings illuminate the interplay of framing and construal level, and points out their applicability in organizational decision making. (C) 2014 Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 264
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle) [J].
Alter, Adam L. ;
Oppenheimer, Daniel M. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 19 (02) :161-167
[2]   The Use of Visual and Verbal Means of Communication Across Psychological Distance [J].
Amit, Elinor ;
Wakslak, Cheryl ;
Trope, Yaacov .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2013, 39 (01) :43-56
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, ADAPTIVE DECISION MA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Psychological science in the public interest, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1539-6053.2008.00033.X
[5]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SUNK COST [J].
ARKES, HR ;
BLUMER, C .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1985, 35 (01) :124-140
[6]   The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test [J].
Bar-Anan, Yoav ;
Liberman, Nira ;
Trope, Yaacov .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2006, 135 (04) :609-622
[7]  
Betsch T, 2008, INTUITION IN JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, P3
[8]   The influence of regulatory focus on risky decision-making [J].
Bryant, Peter ;
Dunford, Richard .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2008, 57 (02) :335-359
[9]   Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making [J].
Crowe, E ;
Higgins, ET .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1997, 69 (02) :117-132
[10]   Frames, biases, and rational decision-making in the human brain [J].
De Martino, Benedetto ;
Kumaran, Dharshan ;
Seymour, Ben ;
Dolan, Raymond J. .
SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5787) :684-687