Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery-Surgical Robotics in the Data Age

被引:72
作者
Haidegger, Tamas [1 ,2 ]
Speidel, Stefanie [3 ,4 ]
Stoyanov, Danail [5 ]
Satava, Richard M. [6 ]
机构
[1] Obuda Univ, Univ Res & Innovat Ctr EKIK, H-1034 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Austrian Ctr Med Innovat & Technol ACMIT, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
[3] Natl Ctr Tumor Dis NCT Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Dresden, Ctr Tactile Internet Human Loop CeTI, D-01069 Dresden, Germany
[5] Univ Coll London UCL, Wellcome EPSRC Ctr Intervent & Surg Sci, London WC1E 6BT, England
[6] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Telerobotics; Minimally invasive surgery; Mechatronics; Systematics; Sensor phenomena and characterization; Robot sensing systems; Medical robotics; Remote handling equipment; Remote-controlled teleoperation; robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAMIS); telesurgical robotics; HEAD-MOUNTED DISPLAY; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; AUGMENTED REALITY; COMPUTER; SYSTEMS; DESIGN; TASK;
D O I
10.1109/JPROC.2022.3180350
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Telesurgical robotics, as a technical solution for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RAMIS), has become the first domain within medicosurgical robotics that achieved a true global clinical adoption. Its relative success (still at a low single-digit percentile total market penetration) roots in the particular human-in-the-loop control, in which the trained surgeon is always kept responsible for the clinical outcome achieved by the robot-actuated invasive tools. Nowadays, this paradigm is challenged by the need for improved surgical performance, traceability, and safety reaching beyond the human capabilities. Partially due to the technical complexity and the financial burden, the adoption of telesurgical robotics has not reached its full potential, by far. Apart from the absolutely market-dominating da Vinci surgical system, there are already 60+ emerging RAMIS robot types, out of which 15 have already achieved some form of regulatory clearance. This article aims to connect the technological advancement with the principles of commercialization, particularly looking at engineering components that are under development and have the potential to bring significant advantages to the clinical practice. Current RAMIS robots often do not exceed the functionalities deriving from their mechatronics, due to the lack of data-driven assistance and smart human-machine collaboration. Computer assistance is gradually gaining more significance within emerging RAMIS systems. Enhanced manipulation capabilities, refined sensors, advanced vision, task-level automation, smart safety features, and data integration mark together the inception of a new era in telesurgical robotics, infiltrated by machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) solutions. Observing other domains, it is definite that a key requirement of a robust AI is the good quality data, derived from proper data acquisition and sharing to allow building solutions in real time based on ML. Emerging RAMIS technologies are reviewed both in a historical and a future perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 846
页数:12
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] Ahmidi N, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6363, P295
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2021, Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance
  • [3] A Comparative Study of Spatio-Temporal U-Nets for Tissue Segmentation in Surgical Robotics
    Attanasio, Aleks
    Alberti, Chiara
    Scaglioni, Bruno
    Marahrens, Nils
    Frangi, Alejandro F.
    Leonetti, Matteo
    Biyani, Chandra Shekhar
    De Momi, Elena
    Valdastri, Pietro
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND BIONICS, 2021, 3 (01): : 53 - 63
  • [4] Azizian M., 2019, The Encyclopedia of Medical Robotics, V1, P3
  • [5] Balicki M, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5761, P108, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-04268-3_14
  • [6] Barattini P., 2019, Human-robot interaction: safety, standardization, and benchmarking
  • [7] Rethinking Autonomous Surgery: Focusing on Enhancement over Autonomy
    Battaglia, Edoardo
    Boehm, Jacob
    Zheng, Yi
    Jamieson, Andrew R.
    Gahan, Jeffrey
    Fey, Ann Majewicz
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (04): : 696 - 705
  • [8] Bauer Sebastian, 2013, Time-Of-Flight and Depth Imaging. Sensors, Algorithms and Applications. Dagstuhl 2012 Seminar on Time-of-Flight Imaging and GCPR 2013 Workshop on Imaging New Modalities: LNCS 8200, P228, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-44964-2_11
  • [9] Active learning using deep Bayesian networks for surgical workflow analysis
    Bodenstedt, Sebastian
    Rivoir, Dominik
    Jenke, Alexander
    Wagner, Martin
    Breucha, Michael
    Mueller-Stich, Beat
    Mees, Soeren Torge
    Weitz, Juergen
    Speidel, Stefanie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2019, 14 (06) : 1079 - 1087
  • [10] Boesl D. B., 2021, INTERAGENCY TASK TEA, P122