Interprofessional Medication Assessment has Effects on the Quality of Medication Among Home Care Patients: Randomized Controlled Intervention Study

被引:14
作者
Auvinen, Kati J. [1 ,2 ]
Raisanen, Johanna [2 ]
Voutilainen, Ari [2 ]
Jyrkka, Johanna [3 ]
Mantyselka, Pekka [2 ,4 ]
Lonnroos, Eija [2 ]
机构
[1] East Savo Hosp Dist, Box 111, FI-57101 Savonlinna, Finland
[2] Univ Eastern Finland, Fac Hlth Sci, Inst Publ Hlth & Clin Nutr, Kuopio, Finland
[3] Finnish Med Agcy, Assessment Pharmacotherapies, Kuopio, Finland
[4] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Primary Hlth Care Unit, Kuopio, Finland
关键词
Home care; medication therapy management; medicines; older people; CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES; POLYPHARMACY; REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.007
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: Multimorbidity and complex medications increase the risk of medication-related problems, especially in vulnerable home care patients. The objective of this study was to examine whether inter professional medication assessment has an effect on medication quality among home care patients. Design: The FIMA (Finnish Interprofessional Medication Assessment) study was a randomized, controlled study comparing physician-led interprofessional medication assessment and usual care. Setting and Participants: The FIMA study was conducted in home care settings in Finland. The participants were >= 65-year-old home care patients with >6 drugs daily, dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, or a recent fall. Methods: Primary outcome measures over the 6-month follow-up were number of drugs, drug-drug interactions, medication-related risk loads, and use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) examined by SFINX, RENBASE, PHARAO, and Meds75+ databases. The databases classified information as follows: A (no known pharmacologic or clinical basis for an increased risk), B (evidence not available/uncertain), C (moderately increased risk which may have clinical relevance), and D (high risk, best to avoid). Logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and the baseline level of the outcome measure served as statistical methods. Results: The mean number of all drugs for home care patients (n = 512) was 15. The odds of drug-induced impairment of renal function (RENBASE D, P = .020) and medication-related risk loads for bleeding (PHARAO D, P = .001), anticholinergic effects (PHARAO D, P = .009), and constipation (PHARAO D, P = .003) decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with usual care. The intervention also reduced the odds of using PIMs (Meds75+ D, P = .005). There were no significant changes in drug drug-interactions or number of drugs. Conclusions and Implications: FIMA intervention improved the medication quality of home care patients. Risks for renal failure, anticholinergic effects, bleeding, constipation, and the use of PIMs were reduced significantly. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 81
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   Drug Dosing in Patients with Renal Insufficiency in a Hospital Setting using Electronic Prescribing and Automated Reporting of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate [J].
Nielsen, Anita L. ;
Henriksen, Daniel P. ;
Marinakis, Christianna ;
Hellebek, Annemarie ;
Birn, Henrik ;
Nybo, Mads ;
Sondergaard, Jens ;
Nymark, Anita ;
Pedersen, Court .
BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 114 (05) :407-413
[22]   Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people [J].
Patterson, Susan M. ;
Hughes, Carmel ;
Kerse, Ngaire ;
Cardwell, Chris R. ;
Bradley, Marie C. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (05)
[23]   Higher Fit-fOR-The-Aged (FORTA) Scores Comprising Medication Errors are Associated with Impaired Cognitive and Physical Function Tests in the VALFORTA Trial [J].
Pazan, Farhad ;
Burkhardt, Heinrich ;
Frohnhofen, Helmut ;
Weiss, Christel ;
Throm, Christina ;
Kuhn-Thiel, Alexandra ;
Wehling, Martin .
DRUGS & AGING, 2019, 36 (03) :269-277
[24]   Concept Analysis of Interdisciplinary Collaboration [J].
Petri, Laura .
NURSING FORUM, 2010, 45 (02) :73-82
[25]   Patient-reported common symptoms as an assessment of interventions in medication reviews: a randomised, controlled trial [J].
Schoenmakers, Tim W. A. ;
Wensing, Michel ;
De Smet, Peter A. G. M. ;
Teichert, Martina .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2018, 40 (01) :126-134
[26]  
Smith SM, 2016, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub3, 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub4]
[27]   Medication reviews in the community: results of a randomized, controlled effectiveness trial [J].
Sorensen, L ;
Stokes, JA ;
Purdie, DM ;
Woodward, M ;
Elliott, R ;
Roberts, MS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 58 (06) :648-664
[28]   How Do Physicians Conduct Medication Reviews? [J].
Tarn, Derjung M. ;
Paterniti, Debora A. ;
Kravitz, Richard L. ;
Fein, Stephanie ;
Wenger, Neil S. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 24 (12) :1296-1302
[29]   Evidence-based strategies for the optimization of pharmacotherapy in older people [J].
Eva Topinková ;
Jean Pierre Baeyens ;
Jean-Pierre Michel ;
Pierre-Olivier Lang .
Drugs & Aging, 2012, 29 (6) :477-494
[30]   An update on the clinical consequences of polypharmacy in older adults: a narrative review [J].
Wastesson, Jonas W. ;
Morin, Lucas ;
Tan, Edwin C. K. ;
Johnell, Kristina .
EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 17 (12) :1185-1196