Interprofessional Medication Assessment has Effects on the Quality of Medication Among Home Care Patients: Randomized Controlled Intervention Study

被引:14
作者
Auvinen, Kati J. [1 ,2 ]
Raisanen, Johanna [2 ]
Voutilainen, Ari [2 ]
Jyrkka, Johanna [3 ]
Mantyselka, Pekka [2 ,4 ]
Lonnroos, Eija [2 ]
机构
[1] East Savo Hosp Dist, Box 111, FI-57101 Savonlinna, Finland
[2] Univ Eastern Finland, Fac Hlth Sci, Inst Publ Hlth & Clin Nutr, Kuopio, Finland
[3] Finnish Med Agcy, Assessment Pharmacotherapies, Kuopio, Finland
[4] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Primary Hlth Care Unit, Kuopio, Finland
关键词
Home care; medication therapy management; medicines; older people; CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES; POLYPHARMACY; REVIEWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.007
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: Multimorbidity and complex medications increase the risk of medication-related problems, especially in vulnerable home care patients. The objective of this study was to examine whether inter professional medication assessment has an effect on medication quality among home care patients. Design: The FIMA (Finnish Interprofessional Medication Assessment) study was a randomized, controlled study comparing physician-led interprofessional medication assessment and usual care. Setting and Participants: The FIMA study was conducted in home care settings in Finland. The participants were >= 65-year-old home care patients with >6 drugs daily, dizziness, orthostatic hypotension, or a recent fall. Methods: Primary outcome measures over the 6-month follow-up were number of drugs, drug-drug interactions, medication-related risk loads, and use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) examined by SFINX, RENBASE, PHARAO, and Meds75+ databases. The databases classified information as follows: A (no known pharmacologic or clinical basis for an increased risk), B (evidence not available/uncertain), C (moderately increased risk which may have clinical relevance), and D (high risk, best to avoid). Logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and the baseline level of the outcome measure served as statistical methods. Results: The mean number of all drugs for home care patients (n = 512) was 15. The odds of drug-induced impairment of renal function (RENBASE D, P = .020) and medication-related risk loads for bleeding (PHARAO D, P = .001), anticholinergic effects (PHARAO D, P = .009), and constipation (PHARAO D, P = .003) decreased significantly in the intervention group compared with usual care. The intervention also reduced the odds of using PIMs (Meds75+ D, P = .005). There were no significant changes in drug drug-interactions or number of drugs. Conclusions and Implications: FIMA intervention improved the medication quality of home care patients. Risks for renal failure, anticholinergic effects, bleeding, constipation, and the use of PIMs were reduced significantly. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 81
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   The Finnish Interprofessional Medication Assessment (FIMA): baseline findings from home care setting [J].
Auvinen, K. ;
Raisanen, J. ;
Merikoski, M. ;
Mantyla, A. ;
Kumpusalo-Vauhkonen, A. ;
Enlund, H. ;
Liukkonen, T. ;
Jyrkka, J. ;
Lonnroos, E. ;
Mantyselka, P. .
AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 31 (10) :1471-1479
[2]   SFINX-a drug-drug interaction database designed for clinical decision support systems [J].
Bottiger, Ylva ;
Laine, Kari ;
Andersson, Marine L. ;
Korhonen, Tuomas ;
Molin, Bjorn ;
Ovesjo, Marie-Louise ;
Tirkkonen, Tuire ;
Rane, Anders ;
Gustafsson, Lars L. ;
Eiermann, Birgit .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 65 (06) :627-633
[3]   Appropriate Polypharmacy and Medicine Safety: When Many is not Too Many [J].
Cadogan, Cathal A. ;
Ryan, Cristin ;
Hughes, Carmel M. .
DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 39 (02) :109-116
[4]   Potentially inappropriate among elderly home medication use care patients in Europe [J].
Fialová, D ;
Topinková, E ;
Gambassi, G ;
Finne-Soveri, H ;
Jónsson, PV ;
Carpenter, I ;
Schroll, M ;
Onder, G ;
Sorbye, LW ;
Wagner, C ;
Reissigová, J ;
Bernabei, R .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (11) :1348-1358
[5]   The rising tide of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions: population database analysis 1995-2010 [J].
Guthrie, Bruce ;
Makubate, Boikanyo ;
Hernandez-Santiago, Virginia ;
Dreischulte, Tobias .
BMC MEDICINE, 2015, 13
[6]   CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts [J].
Hopewell, Sally ;
Clarke, Mike ;
Moher, David ;
Wager, Elizabeth ;
Middleton, Philippa ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. .
LANCET, 2008, 371 (9609) :281-283
[7]   Effectiveness of medication review: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Huiskes, Victor Johan Bernard ;
Burger, David Marinus ;
van den Ende, Cornelia Helena Maria ;
van den Bemt, Bartholomeus Johannes Fredericus .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2017, 18
[8]   The association of potentially inappropriate medication use on health outcomes and hospital costs in community-dwelling older persons: a longitudinal 12-year study [J].
Hyttinen, Virva ;
Jyrkka, Johanna ;
Saastamoinen, Leena K. ;
Vartiainen, Anna-Kaisa ;
Valtonen, Hannu .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 20 (02) :233-243
[9]   Clinically relevant drug-drug interactions and the risk for drug adverse effects among home-dwelling older persons with and without type 2 diabetes [J].
Ikaheimo, Ilona ;
Karjalainen, Merja ;
Tiihonen, Miia ;
Haanpaa, Maija ;
Kautiainen, Hannu ;
Saltevo, Juha ;
Mantyselka, Pekka .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 44 (05) :735-741
[10]  
Karimi Sahar, 2012, Consult Pharm, V27, P564, DOI 10.4140/TCP.n.2012.564