Pan-Canadian Development of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention Quality Indicators

被引:87
作者
Grace, Sherry L. [1 ,2 ]
Poirier, Paul [3 ]
Norris, Colleen M. [4 ]
Oakes, Garth H. [5 ]
Somanader, Deborah S. [6 ]
Suskin, Neville [7 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Western Hosp, Fac Hlth, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, GoodLife Fitness Cardiovasc Rehabil Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Laval, Fac Pharm, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Alberta, Edmonton Clin Hlth Acad, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Cardiac Care Network Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] York Univ, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON M3J 2R7, Canada
[7] St Josephs Hlth Care London, Cardiac Rehabil & Secondary Prevent Program, London, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Med Cardiol, London, ON, Canada
[9] Univ Western Ontario, Program Expt Med, London, ON, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.cjca.2014.04.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) is implementing the Canadian Heart Health Strategy and Action Plan recommendation to build knowledge infrastructure, through its Data Definitions and Quality Indicator (QI) project. The CCS selected cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and secondary prevention as a content area for QI development. In accordance with the CCS QI Best Practice Methodology, rapid reviews of the literature were conducted. A long list of 37 QIs, in the areas of structure, process, and outcome were developed. Through an online survey, 26 (42%) of all contacted external experts rated each QI on importance, scientific acceptability, and feasibility, using a 7-point scale. The overall mean rating was 5.4 +/- 1.4. Through a consensus process, the working group excluded 8 QIs based on this feedback, and several others were revised. A 30-day Web consultation was then undertaken, to solicit input from the broader CCS and CR community. A "top 5" list of QIs was requested by the CCS, which were: (1) inpatients referred to CR; (2) wait times from referral to CR enrollment; (3) patient self-management education; (4) increase in exercise capacity; and (5) emergency response strategy. Knowledge translation activities are now under way to promote utilization of the QIs and ultimately improve CR care.
引用
收藏
页码:945 / 948
页数:4
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   An International Environmental Scan of Quality Indicators for Cardiovascular Care [J].
Abrahamyan, Lusine ;
Boom, Nicole ;
Donovan, Linda R. ;
Tu, Jack V. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 28 (01) :110-118
[2]  
Heran BS, 2011, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3, 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub2]
[3]  
Stone J.A., 2009, Canadian guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation and cardiovascular disease prevention: Translating knowledge into action, V3rd
[4]   AACVPR/ACCF/AHA 2010 Update: Performance Measures on Cardiac Rehabilitation for Referral to Cardiac Rehabilitation/Secondary Prevention Services: A Report of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Performance Measures for Cardiac Rehabilitation) [J].
Thomas, Randall J. ;
King, Marjorie ;
Lui, Karen ;
Oldridge, Neil ;
Pina, Ileana L. ;
Spertus, John .
CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (13) :1342-1350
[5]   Best Practices for Developing Cardiovascular Quality Indicators [J].
Tu, Jack V. ;
Abrahamyan, Lusine ;
Donovan, Linda R. ;
Boom, Nicole .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 29 (11) :1516-1519