Online peer to peer support: Qualitative analysis of UK and US open mental health Facebook groups

被引:42
作者
Prescott, Julie [1 ]
Rathbone, Amy Leigh [1 ]
Brown, Gill [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bolton, Sch Educ & Psychol, Bolton, England
关键词
Online; peer; support; UK; US; mental health; SOCIAL MEDIA; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS; ETHICAL-ISSUES; ILLNESS STIGMA; YOUNG-PEOPLE; HELP-SEEKING; TO-FACE; INTERNET; CARE; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1177/2055207620979209
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective This research aimed to gain further understanding of how open Facebook groups are used for online peer to peer support and identify any similarities and/or differences between UK and US groups. Method A systematic search of mental health related open Facebook groups was conducted using relevant key words. The posts from 14 UK and 11 US groups were acquired over a three month period and content thematically analysed using Nvivo. Results Findings support previous research which evidences that online peer to peer support is beneficial for users seeking mental health information. Said support can increase feelings of connectedness, reduce feelings of isolation, and provide a platform for comparison of perspectives relating to personal experiences. Group membership may offer hope and increase feelings of empowerment in those using Facebook groups as a support mechanism. There was similar discourse seen throughout both UK and US posts in regards to gender inequality, lack of awareness and stigmatisation. Conclusions The study highlights the positive impact of shared personal experiences, and offers a greater understanding of the benefits of online peer to peer support for mental health and wellbeing. There is evidence that, whilst mental health is becoming a more widely discussed topic, in both the UK and US, it remains negatively perceived. Questions are posed for group administrators and health professionals relating to their utilisation and moderation of such online peer to peer support networks.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 92 条
[41]  
Joffe H., 2004, Research methods for clinical and health psychology, P56, DOI 10.4135/9781849209793
[42]   Smartphone-mediated communication vs. face-to-face interaction: Two routes to social support and problematic use of smartphone [J].
Kim, Jung-Hyun .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 67 :282-291
[43]  
Lampe C., 2012, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, P3195, DOI DOI 10.1145/2207676.2208739
[44]   Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye-contact on toxic online disinhibition [J].
Lapidot-Lefler, Noam ;
Barak, Azy .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2012, 28 (02) :434-443
[45]   Patient Use of Email, Facebook, and Physician Websites to Communicate with Physicians: A National Online Survey of Retail Pharmacy Users [J].
Lee, Joy L. ;
Choudhry, Niteesh K. ;
Wu, Albert W. ;
Matlin, Olga S. ;
Brennan, Troyen A. ;
Shrank, William H. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 (01) :45-51
[46]   The effect of informal social support: Face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication [J].
Lewandowski, Joshua ;
Rosenberg, Benjamin D. ;
Parks, M. Jordan ;
Siegel, Jason T. .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2011, 27 (05) :1806-1814
[47]   The Phenomenon of Social Isolation in the Severely Mentally Ill [J].
Linz, Sheila J. ;
Sturm, Bonnie A. .
PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2013, 49 (04) :243-254
[48]   Icelandic inclusion, German hesitation and American fear: A cross-cultural comparison of mental-health stigma and the media [J].
Manago, Bianca ;
Pescosolido, Bernice A. ;
Olafsdottir, Sigrun .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 47 (02) :90-98
[49]  
MAYRING P, 2014, QUALITATIVE CONTENT, DOI [DOI 10.1177/2158244014522633, 10.1177/2158244014522633, DOI 10.17169/FQS-1.2.1089]
[50]   Expanding the Facebook Platform to Engage and Educate Online Communities [J].
Mogul, Douglas B. ;
Henderson, Macey L. ;
Bridges, John F. P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 (04) :457-458