Reliability of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: comparison with the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV-TR in a population sample

被引:37
作者
Dodd, Seetal [1 ]
Williams, Lana J. [1 ]
Jacka, Felice N. [1 ]
Pasco, Julie A. [1 ]
Bjerkeset, Ottar
Berk, Michael [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Clin & Biomed Sci, Barwon Hlth, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Clin & Biomed Sci Barwon Hlth, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
[3] Orygen Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Mental Hlth Res Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
bipolar disorder; detection; SCID; screening; BIPOLAR DISORDER; VALIDATION; VERSION; DEPRESSION; INSTRUMENT; SPANISH; MDQ;
D O I
10.1080/00048670902873706
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: The Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ) is a widely used self-report screening instrument for the detection of bipolar disorder in clinical populations. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the reliability of this instrument. Methods: Screening results using the MDQ were compared with results obtained using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Research Version, Non-patient edition (SCID) in a community-based sample of 1066 women. Trained personnel, who were blind to the results of the MDQ screen, conducted clinical interviews. Results: Using the MDQ, 21 women screened positive for bipolar disorder, and using the SCID diagnoses, 24 women were confirmed with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Six women were detected on both instruments. Compared to the SCID, the sensitivity for the MDQ was 25%, specificity 99%, positive predictive value 28%, negative predictive value 98%, and a demonstrated kappa of 0.25. The MDQ failed to detect any of the 11 participants in the study with bipolar II disorder and missed seven of 13 participants with bipolar I disorder or bipolar not otherwise specified. Of the 21 women who screened positive using the MDQ, 19 had current or past psychopathologies other than bipolar disorder. Conclusion: The MDQ has substantial limitations for detection of bipolar disorder, in particular bipolar II disorder, in non-clinical populations.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 530
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, TEXT REVISION
[2]  
Boudreaux Edwin D, 2006, Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry, V8, P348
[3]  
Carta Mauro Giovanni, 2006, Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health, V2, P2, DOI 10.1186/1745-0179-2-2
[4]  
Carta Mauro Giovanni, 2005, Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health, V1, P4, DOI 10.1186/1745-0179-1-4
[5]   Screening for bipolar disorder in a primary care practice [J].
Das, AK ;
Olfson, M ;
Gameroff, MJ ;
Pilowsky, DJ ;
Blanco, C ;
Feder, A ;
Gross, R ;
Neria, Y ;
Lantigua, R ;
Shea, S ;
Weissman, MM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (08) :956-963
[6]  
Hardoy Maria Carolina, 2005, Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health, V1, P8, DOI 10.1186/1745-0179-1-8
[7]   Prevalence of osteoporosis in Australian women -: Geelong Osteoporosis study [J].
Henry, MJ ;
Pasco, JA ;
Nicholson, GC ;
Seeman, E ;
Kotowicz, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2000, 3 (03) :261-268
[8]   Development and validation of a screening instrument for bipolar spectrum disorder: The mood disorder questionnaire [J].
Hirschfeld, RMA ;
Williams, JBW ;
Spitzer, RL ;
Calabrese, JR ;
Flynn, L ;
Keck, PE ;
Lewis, L ;
McElroy, SL ;
Post, RM ;
Rapport, DJ ;
Russell, JM ;
Sachs, GS ;
Zajecka, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 157 (11) :1873-1875
[9]   Screening for bipolar disorder in patients treated for depression in a family medicine clinic [J].
Hirschfeld, RMA ;
Cass, AR ;
Holt, DCL ;
Carlson, CA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2005, 18 (04) :233-239
[10]   Validity of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: A general population study [J].
Hirschfeld, RMA ;
Holzer, C ;
Calabrese, JR ;
Weissman, M ;
Reed, M ;
Davies, M ;
Frye, MA ;
Keck, P ;
McElroy, S ;
Lewis, L ;
Tierce, J ;
Wagner, KD ;
Hazard, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 160 (01) :178-180