Prognostic value of response to external radiation in stage IIIB cancer cervix in predicting clinical outcomes: A retrospective analysis of 556 patients from India

被引:10
作者
Saibishkumar, Elantholi P. [1 ]
Patel, Firuza D. [1 ]
Sharma, Suresh C. [1 ]
Karunanidhi, Gunaseelan [1 ]
Ghoshal, Sushmita [1 ]
Kumar, Vinay [1 ]
Kapoor, Rakesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Radiotherapy, Chandigarh 160012, India
关键词
cancer cervix; external radiation; gross residual tumor; age; overall treatment time;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2006.03.016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: To evaluate the prognostic significance of response to external beam radiation (EBRT) in predicting the clinical outcomes in stage IIIB cancer cervix and to find out factors affecting response to EBRT. Patients and methods: This retrospective study included 556 patients of cancer cervix stage IIIB treated between 1996 and 2001 with EBRT (46 Gy/23fx/4.5 weeks) followed by intracavitary radiotherapy (ICRT). At the end of EBRT, response to EBRT was grouped as 'no gross residual tumor'(NRT) or 'gross residual tumor'(GRT). Results: Follow up ranged from 2 to 93 months with a median of 36 months. Median dose to point A was 81 Gy. At the end of EBRT, 393 patients (70.7%) attained NRT response. NRT responders had significantly better 5 year pelvic control, disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) than those who had a GIRT response (75.6 vs. 54.6%; 60.6 vs. 31.9% and 62.6 vs. 33.7%, respectively; all P values < 0.0001). Apart from response to EBRT, overall treatment time also has emerged as an independent factor to affect all clinical outcomes in multivariate analysis but age had significant impact on pelvic control only. Age was the only factor, which significantly influenced the response to EBRT in univariate as well as multivariate analysis (P = < 0.001, OR= 1.973, 95% C.I. 1.357-2.868). Patients with age more than 50 years had more NRT response (77%) than patients with age less than 50 years (63.8%). Conclusions: Patients who attain NRT response to EBRT will have an impressive long term pelvic control, DFS and OS in stage IIIB cancer cervix. Older patients (>= 50 years) attain significantly higher NRT rates than younger patients. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 146
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical cancer by high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy
    Chen, SW
    Liang, JA
    Yang, SN
    Ko, HL
    Lin, FJ
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 67 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [2] Predictors of survival end points in patients with cancer of the cervix on long-term follow-up: Inferences and implications from an audit of patients treated with a specific radiotherapy protocol
    Datta, NR
    Pasricha, R
    Singh, U
    Srivastava, A
    [J]. CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 16 (08) : 536 - 542
  • [3] Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: An update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01
    Eifel, PJ
    Winter, K
    Morris, M
    Levenback, C
    Grigsby, PW
    Cooper, J
    Rotman, M
    Gershenson, D
    Mutch, DG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (05) : 872 - 880
  • [4] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH CERVIX CANCER TREATED BY RADIATION-THERAPY - RESULTS OF A MULTIPLE-REGRESSION ANALYSIS
    FYLES, AW
    PINTILIE, M
    KIRKBRIDE, P
    LEVIN, W
    MANCHUL, LA
    RAWLINGS, GA
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 35 (02) : 107 - 117
  • [5] Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Green, JA
    Kirwan, JM
    Tierney, JF
    Symonds, P
    Fresco, L
    Collingwood, M
    Williams, CJ
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 358 (9284) : 781 - 786
  • [6] PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF TUMOR RESPONSE DURING RADIOTHERAPY IN CERVICAL CARCINOMA
    GROSSMAN, I
    KUROHARA, SS
    WEBSTER, JH
    GEORGE, FW
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1973, 107 (02) : 411 - 415
  • [7] HARDT N, 1982, CANCER, V49, P35, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19820101)49:1<35::AID-CNCR2820490108>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-3
  • [9] PROGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT OF TUMOR-REGRESSION AFTER EXTERNAL IRRADIATION FOR CERVICAL-CANCER
    HONG, JH
    CHEN, MS
    LIN, FJ
    TANG, SG
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1992, 22 (05): : 913 - 917
  • [10] JACOBS AJ, 1986, CANCER, V57, P944, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19860301)57:5<944::AID-CNCR2820570512>3.0.CO