Acoustic Analysis of Persian Vowels in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison With Hearing-impaired Children Using Hearing Aid and Normal-hearing Children

被引:8
作者
Jafari, Narges [1 ]
Yadegari, Fariba [1 ]
Jalaie, Shohreh [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Social Welf & Rehabil Sci, Dept Speech Therapy, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Cochlear implant; Hearing aid; Acoustic analysis; Formants; Vowel space; SPEECH PRODUCTION; DEAF; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.006
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective. Vowel production in essence is auditorily controlled; hence, the role of the auditory feedback in vowel production is very important. The purpose of this study was to compare formant frequencies and vowel space in Persian-speaking deaf children with cochlear implantation (CI), hearing-impaired children with hearing aid (HA), and their normal-hearing (NH) peers. Methods. A total of 40 prelingually children with hearing impairment and 20 NH groups participated in this study. Participants were native Persian speakers. The average of first formant frequency (F-1) and second formant frequency (F-2) of the six vowels were measured using Praat software (version 5.1.44). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the differences between the three3 groups. Results. The mean value of F-1 for vowel/i/was significantly different (between CI and NH children and also between HA and NH groups) (F-2,F- 57 = 9.229, P < 0.001). For vowel /a/, the mean value of F-1 was significantly different (between HA and NH groups) (F-2,F- 57 = 3.707, P < 0.05). Regarding the second formant frequency, a post hoc Tukey test revealed that the differences were between HA and NH children (P < 0.05). F-2 for vowel /o/ was significantly different (F-2,F- 57 = 4.572, P < 0.05). Also, the mean value of F-2 for vowel /a/was significantly different (F-2,F- 57 = 3.184, P < 0.05). Conclusion. About 1 year after implantation, the formants shift closer to those of the NH listeners who tend to have more expanded vowel spaces than hearing-impaired listeners with hearing aids. Probably, this condition is because CI has a subtly positive impact on the place of articulation of vowels.
引用
收藏
页码:763.e1 / 763.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   THE VOWEL FORMANTS OF DEAF AND NORMAL-HEARING 11-YEAR-OLD TO 14-YEAR-OLD BOYS [J].
ANGELOCCI, AA ;
KOPP, GA ;
HOLBROOK, A .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1964, 29 (02) :156-170
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, COURSE PHONETICS
[3]  
Ball MJ, 2008, INSTRUMENTAL CLIN PH, P149
[4]   A Comparison of Vowel Productions in Prelingually Deaf Children Using Cochlear Implants, Severe Hearing-Impaired Children Using Conventional Hearing Aids and Normal-Hearing Children [J].
Baudonck, N. ;
Van Lierde, K. ;
Dhooge, I. ;
Corthals, P. .
FOLIA PHONIATRICA ET LOGOPAEDICA, 2011, 63 (03) :154-160
[5]  
Blamey P.J., 2006, ADV SPOKEN LANGUAGE, P85
[6]  
BOONE DR, 1966, VOLTA REV, V68, P686
[7]   Postimplantation audition and educational attainment in children with prelingually acquired profound deafness [J].
Boothroyd, A ;
Boothroyd-Turner, D .
ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2002, 111 (05) :79-84
[8]  
EDWARDS HAROLDT., 1992, Applied phonetics: The sounds of American English
[9]   Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five [J].
Geers, A ;
Brenner, C ;
Davidson, L .
EAR AND HEARING, 2003, 24 (01) :24S-35S
[10]   Predictors of reading skill development in children with early cochlear implantation [J].
Geers, AE .
EAR AND HEARING, 2003, 24 (01) :59S-68S