Diagnostic value and cost-effectiveness of on-site evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens: Review of 5,688 cases

被引:236
作者
Nasuti, JF [1 ]
Gupta, PK [1 ]
Baloch, ZW [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Cytopathol & Cytometry Sect, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
fine-needle aspiration; cost-effectiveness; diagnostic accuracy;
D O I
10.1002/dc.10065
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has proven to be a safe, economical, accurate, and rapid diagnostic technique. A successful FNA requires a specimen with adequate cellularity, high-quality preparation, all experienced aspirator, and cytopathologist. Up to 32% of FNAs in various organs (thyroid, breast, lung, etc.) may be nondiagnostic due to scant cellularity and poor preparation. On-site immediate evaluation of FNA specimens can be beneficial in determination of adequacy: triage for ancillary studies and produce a preliminary diagnosis of the specimen, which often facilitates rapid clinical decisions. In this study, we compared the on-site FNA interpretation with the final diagnosis and calculated its cost benefit. Reports of 5,688 on-site FNA cases from the files of the University of Pennsylvania Medical Center over a 5-yr period (1/1/96-12/31/00) were reviewed. Data of the immediate on-site interpretation and the final diagnosis in each case were compared to determine the diagnostic accuracy, clinical utility, and cost-effectiveness of on-site FNA evaluation. At our institution the average cost per FNA based oil laboratory technical and professional fees ($1,743) and the weighted average cost, based oil utilization, of ancillary laboratory studies ($328) and guidance procedures ($1,025) is $3,096 An additional fee of $231 per case is charged for on-site FNA evaluation bY an attending cytopathologist. The average reported rate of nondiagnostic FNAs without on-site evaluation is 20%. Our own nondiagnostic rate for FNAs with on-site evaluation is 0.98%. If one assumes that patients will undergo a repeat FNA for each nondiagnostic specimen, the estimated additional cost in direct institutional charges is $2,022,626 over 5 yr or $404,525 per yr without on-site evaluation. This potential cost savings would be realized by utilizing on-site evaluation despite the additional fee due to a higher rate of specimen adequacy. Based oil this study, oil-site cytopathologic evaluation of FNA specimens is accurate, cost-effective, and has improved patient care at our institution. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 4
页数:4
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   VALUE OF HAVING A CYTOPATHOLOGIST PRESENT DURING PERCUTANEOUS FINE-NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY OF LUNG - REPORT OF 55 CANCER-PATIENTS AND METAANALYSIS OF THE LITERATURE [J].
AUSTIN, JHM ;
COHEN, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1993, 160 (01) :175-177
[2]  
BARROWS GH, 1986, CANCER, V58, P1493, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19861001)58:7<1493::AID-CNCR2820580720>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-F
[4]  
BELL DA, 1983, CANCER, V51, P1182, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19830401)51:7<1182::AID-CNCR2820510703>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-A
[6]  
Bloustein P A, 1977, Pathol Annu, V12 Pt 2, P251
[7]  
Cha I, 1996, Pathology (Phila), V4, P337
[8]  
CHANG MC, 1993, CHIN MED J, V52, P325
[9]  
COHEN MB, 1986, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V110, P813
[10]  
DUCATMAN BS, 1989, ACTA CYTOL, V33, P797