The Eurozone crisis and citizen engagement in EU affairs

被引:38
作者
Baglioni, Sebastian [1 ]
Hurrelmann, Achim [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Carleton Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[2] Carleton Univ, Polit Sci, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[3] Carleton Univ, Inst European Russian & Eurasian Studies, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
关键词
Eurozone crisis; citizen engagement; political efficacy; discursive frames; political responsibility; EUROPEAN INTEGRATION; POLITICIZING EUROPE; CONSEQUENCES;
D O I
10.1080/01402382.2015.1081507
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
While the Eurozone crisis has contributed to Europeanisation trends in the domestic politics of EU member states, it has not to the same extent triggered citizen mobilisation in EU-level democratic procedures. Theories that treat politicisation as an undifferentiated phenomenon tend to miss this important distinction. This article suggests that the weakness of supranational citizen mobilisation is linked to factors that restrict the citizens' receptiveness to EU-related messages: limited knowledge of the EU and a weak sense of political efficacy, a discursive framing that conceptualises the EU as a consortium of member states rather than a supranational entity, and attributions of responsibility for the crisis that de-emphasise the role of EU policies. These factors constitute cultural opportunity structures that influence politicisation patterns; they imply that politicisation is, under present conditions, more likely to result in a renationalisation than in a supranationalisation of EU politics.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 124
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   From Euroscepticism to Euro-enthusiasm: How Malta Weathered the Eurozone Crisis [J].
Harwood, Mark .
SOUTH EUROPEAN SOCIETY AND POLITICS, 2024, 29 (04) :543-564
[32]   The Eurozone in Crisis - A Kaleckian Macroeconomic Regime and Policy Perspective [J].
Hein, Eckhard ;
Martschin, Judith .
REVIEW OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2020, 32 (04) :563-588
[33]   Policy learning in the Eurozone crisis: modes, power and functionality [J].
Claire A. Dunlop ;
Claudio M. Radaelli .
Policy Sciences, 2016, 49 :107-124
[34]   Arguing about the Eurozone crisis: a discursive institutionalist analysis [J].
Schmidt, Vivien A. .
CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2013, 7 (04) :455-462
[35]   The IRB model, bank regulatory arbitrage, and the Eurozone crisis [J].
Liu, Cai .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2021, 116
[36]   National Political Elites, European Integration and the Eurozone Crisis [J].
Chiru, Mihail .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY EUROPEAN RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (03) :319-322
[37]   Beliefs of political leaders: conditions for change in the Eurozone crisis [J].
Swinkels, Marij .
WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2020, 43 (05) :1163-1186
[38]   Financialization and the Emergence of the Eurozone Crisis: a Comparative Capitalism Perspective [J].
Noelke, Andreas .
KOLNER ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE UND SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2018, 70 :439-459
[39]   IMPACT OF EUROZONE SOVEREIGN DEBT CRISIS ON CHINA AND INDIA [J].
Dua, Pami ;
Tuteja, Divya .
SINGAPORE ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2017, 62 (05) :1137-1164
[40]   Introducing the debate section: "The EU in crisis: EU studies in crisis?' [J].
Rittberger, Berthold ;
Blauberger, Michael .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN PUBLIC POLICY, 2018, 25 (03) :436-439