Development and pilot of a decision-aid for patients with bipolar II disorder and their families making decisions about treatment options to prevent relapse

被引:15
作者
Fisher, Alana [1 ,2 ]
Sharpe, Louise [1 ]
Anderson, Josephine [3 ,4 ]
Manicavasagar, Vijaya [3 ,4 ]
Juraskova, Ilona [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Ctr Med & Evidence Based Decis Making CeMPED, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Prince Wales Hosp, Black Dog Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales, Sch Psychiat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
MENTAL-HEALTH; MAINTENANCE TREATMENT; PRIMARY-CARE; DOUBLE-BLIND; INFORMATION; PREFERENCES; DEPRESSION; LITHIUM; ADULTS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0200490
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Treatment decisions in bipolar II disorder (BPII) are finely-balanced and sensitive to patient preferences. This pilot study evaluated a decision-aid booklet (DA) for patients with BPII (and their family) to obtain evidence on its acceptability, feasibility, safety, and usefulness in potential end-users. Methods The DA booklet was developed according to International Patient Decision-Aid Standards. Thirty-one patients diagnosed with BPII and their families (n = 11), who were currently making or had previously made treatment decisions, participated. Participants read the DA and completed validated and purpose-designed questionnaires. A follow-up semi-structured telephone interview elicited more in-depth DA feedback (n = 40). Results Patients and family endorsed the DA booklet as: easy-to-use (100% agree), useful in treatment decision-making (100%), presenting balanced (patients = 96.8%, family = 100%), upto-date (93.5%, 100%) and trustworthy information (93.5%, 100%) that did not provoke anxiety (93.5%, 90.9%). All participants stated that they would recommend the DA to others. Following DA use, all except one participant (97.6%) demonstrated adequate treatment knowledge (> 50% score). Patients reported low decisional conflict (M = 18.90/100) following DA use and felt well-prepared to make treatment decisions (M = 4.28/5). Most patients (90.3%) indicated uptake of treatments consistent with the best available clinical evidence. Additionally, a large proportion of patients made an informed choice about medication (65.5%) with adjunctive psychological treatment (50.0%), based on adequate knowledge and their treatment values. Interview findings further supported the DA's acceptability among participants. Discussion Pilot findings indicate that patients with BPII and their family consider this DA booklet highly acceptable and useful in making evidence-based treatment decisions that align with their treatment preferences.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 76 条
[41]   Shared decision making for psychiatric medication management: beyond the micro-social [J].
Morant, Nicola ;
Kaminskiy, Emma ;
Ramon, Shulamit .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2016, 19 (05) :1002-1014
[42]   Health Literacy Demand of Printed Lifestyle Patient Information Materials Aimed at People With Chronic Kidney Disease: Are Materials Easy to Understand and Act On and Do They Use Meaningful Visual Aids? [J].
Morony, Suzanne ;
McCaffery, Kirsten J. ;
Kirkendall, Suzanne ;
Jansen, Jesse ;
Webster, Angela C. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2017, 22 (02) :163-170
[43]   The Single Item Literacy Screener: Evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability [J].
Morris N.S. ;
MacLean C.D. ;
Chew L.D. ;
Littenberg B. .
BMC Family Practice, 7 (1)
[44]   Increasing Engagement in Evidence-Based PTSD Treatment Through Shared Decision-Making: A Pilot Study [J].
Mott, Juliette M. ;
Stanley, Melinda A. ;
Street, Richard L. ;
Grady, Rebecca H. ;
Teng, Ellen J. .
MILITARY MEDICINE, 2014, 179 (02) :143-149
[45]   When patients lack capacity: The roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions [J].
Nolan, MT ;
Hughes, M ;
Narendra, DP ;
Sood, JR ;
Terry, PB ;
Astrow, AB ;
Kub, J ;
Thompson, RE ;
Sulmasy, DP .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2005, 30 (04) :342-353
[46]  
O'Connor A., 2002, User manual-acceptability
[47]  
O'Connor A.M., 2006, OTTAWA DECISION SUPP
[48]  
OConnor A., 2016, USER MANUAL D STAGE
[49]   VALIDATION OF A DECISIONAL CONFLICT SCALE [J].
OCONNOR, AM .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1995, 15 (01) :25-30
[50]   Psychological interventions for adults with bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Oud, Matthijs ;
Mayo-Wilson, Evan ;
Braidwood, Ruth ;
Schulte, Peter ;
Jones, Steven H. ;
Morriss, Richard ;
Kupka, Ralph ;
Cuijpers, Pim ;
Kendall, Tim .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 208 (03) :213-+