Development and pilot of a decision-aid for patients with bipolar II disorder and their families making decisions about treatment options to prevent relapse

被引:15
作者
Fisher, Alana [1 ,2 ]
Sharpe, Louise [1 ]
Anderson, Josephine [3 ,4 ]
Manicavasagar, Vijaya [3 ,4 ]
Juraskova, Ilona [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Ctr Med & Evidence Based Decis Making CeMPED, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Prince Wales Hosp, Black Dog Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ New South Wales, Sch Psychiat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
MENTAL-HEALTH; MAINTENANCE TREATMENT; PRIMARY-CARE; DOUBLE-BLIND; INFORMATION; PREFERENCES; DEPRESSION; LITHIUM; ADULTS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0200490
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Treatment decisions in bipolar II disorder (BPII) are finely-balanced and sensitive to patient preferences. This pilot study evaluated a decision-aid booklet (DA) for patients with BPII (and their family) to obtain evidence on its acceptability, feasibility, safety, and usefulness in potential end-users. Methods The DA booklet was developed according to International Patient Decision-Aid Standards. Thirty-one patients diagnosed with BPII and their families (n = 11), who were currently making or had previously made treatment decisions, participated. Participants read the DA and completed validated and purpose-designed questionnaires. A follow-up semi-structured telephone interview elicited more in-depth DA feedback (n = 40). Results Patients and family endorsed the DA booklet as: easy-to-use (100% agree), useful in treatment decision-making (100%), presenting balanced (patients = 96.8%, family = 100%), upto-date (93.5%, 100%) and trustworthy information (93.5%, 100%) that did not provoke anxiety (93.5%, 90.9%). All participants stated that they would recommend the DA to others. Following DA use, all except one participant (97.6%) demonstrated adequate treatment knowledge (> 50% score). Patients reported low decisional conflict (M = 18.90/100) following DA use and felt well-prepared to make treatment decisions (M = 4.28/5). Most patients (90.3%) indicated uptake of treatments consistent with the best available clinical evidence. Additionally, a large proportion of patients made an informed choice about medication (65.5%) with adjunctive psychological treatment (50.0%), based on adequate knowledge and their treatment values. Interview findings further supported the DA's acceptability among participants. Discussion Pilot findings indicate that patients with BPII and their family consider this DA booklet highly acceptable and useful in making evidence-based treatment decisions that align with their treatment preferences.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P1448
[2]  
[Anonymous], BIPOLAR DISORDER EVI
[3]  
[Anonymous], BIPOLAR DISORDER EVI
[4]  
APA, 2013, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.744053
[5]  
Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council, 2016, GEN GUID MED PRACT P
[6]   Competing priorities in treatment decision-making: a US national survey of individuals with depression and clinicians who treat depression [J].
Barr, Paul J. ;
Forcino, Rachel C. ;
Mishra, Manish ;
Blitzer, Rachel ;
Elwyn, Glyn .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (01)
[7]  
BAUER MS, 1991, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V48, P807
[8]   Validation of a Preparation for Decision Making scale [J].
Bennett, Carol ;
Graham, Ian D. ;
Kristjansson, Elizabeth ;
Kearing, Stephen A. ;
Clay, Kate F. ;
O'Connor, Annette M. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2010, 78 (01) :130-133
[9]   A placebo-controlled 18-month trial of lamotrigine and lithium maintenance treatment in recently depressed patients with bipolar I disorder [J].
Calabrese, JR ;
Bowden, CL ;
Sachs, G ;
Yatham, LN ;
Behnke, K ;
Mehtonen, OP ;
Montgomery, P ;
Ascher, J ;
Paska, W ;
Earl, N ;
DeVeaugh-Geiss, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 64 (09) :1013-1024
[10]   INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATION PREFERENCES AMONG CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
CASSILETH, BR ;
ZUPKIS, RV ;
SUTTONSMITH, K ;
MARCH, V .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 92 (06) :832-836