Dispersal capacity and broad-scale landscape structure shape benthic invertebrate communities along stream networks

被引:11
作者
Li, Fengqing [1 ,2 ]
Tonkin, Jonathan D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Haase, Peter [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Senckenberg Res Inst, Clamecystr 12, D-63571 Gelnhausen, Germany
[2] Nat Hist Museum Frankfurt, Dept River Ecol & Conservat, Clamecystr 12, D-63571 Gelnhausen, Germany
[3] Oregon State Univ, Dept Integrat Biol, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[4] Univ Duisburg Essen, Fac Biol, Essen, Germany
来源
LIMNOLOGICA | 2018年 / 71卷
关键词
Macroinvertebrate; Dispersal ability; Dendritic networks; Mountain and floodplain; Geographic barrier; GENETIC DIVERSITY CORRELATIONS; METACOMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DENDRITIC NETWORKS; SPATIAL PROCESSES; SPECIES TRAITS; PATTERNS; ECOLOGY; BIODIVERSITY; FISH; CONNECTIVITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.limno.2018.06.003
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Dispersal is a fundamental trait influencing species' distribution patterns and metacommunity structure. Yet, for stream communities it remains unclear how communities differ in dispersal capacity. Due to the dendritic network structure of streams and the greater spatial variability in environmental conditions in headwaters than in mainstems, we asked three main questions: 1) Do benthic invertebrates inhabiting headwaters have lower community-wide dispersal capacities (DCc) on average than those living in mainstems? 2) In turn, does the degree of community dissimilarity among sites differ between the different locations in the river network? 3) Are these differences more pronounced in highland streams compared to lowland streams as a consequence of major landscape features (i.e. mountains)? To examine these questions, we compiled 1466 benthic invertebrate samples across the southern highland and northern lowland areas of Germany. Results showed that overall DCc increased with stream size in both highland and lowland streams. In highland streams, higher DCc in mainstems was associated with more homogeneous communities compared to headwater communities. However, this pattern did not occur in lowland streams. This suggests that both dispersal capacity and landscape structure interact to determine community structure in these networks. Our results therefore stress the importance of considering dispersal traits and landscape features, as well as habitat control (or environmental filtering) to better understand (meta-) community structure across various landscape types.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 74
页数:7
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] A dispersal-induced paradox: synchrony and stability in stochastic metapopulations
    Abbott, Karen C.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 14 (11) : 1158 - 1169
  • [2] Dispersal in dendritic networks: Ecological consequences on the spatial distribution of population densities
    Altermatt, Florian
    Fronhofer, Emanuel A.
    [J]. FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (01) : 22 - 32
  • [3] River network properties shape α-diversity and community similarity patterns of aquatic insect communities across major drainage basins
    Altermatt, Florian
    Seymour, Mathew
    Martinez, Nicolas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2013, 40 (12) : 2249 - 2260
  • [4] Interactive effects of disturbance and dispersal directionality on species richness and composition in metacommunities
    Altermatt, Florian
    Schreiber, Sebastian
    Holyoak, Marcel
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2011, 92 (04) : 859 - 870
  • [5] The effects of dispersal and river spatial structure on asynchrony in consumer-resource metacommunities
    Anderson, Kurt E.
    Hayes, Sean M.
    [J]. FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (01) : 100 - 113
  • [6] Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity
    Anderson, MJ
    Ellingsen, KE
    McArdle, BH
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (06) : 683 - 693
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2005, METACOMMUNITIES SPAT
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2015, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2014, R PACKAGE
  • [10] Spatiotemporal controls of simulated metacommunity dynamics in dendritic networks
    Auerbach, Daniel A.
    Poff, N. LeRoy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BENTHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 30 (01): : 235 - 251