A scoping review of online repositories of quality improvement projects, interventions and initiatives in healthcare

被引:6
作者
Bytautas, Jessica P. [1 ,2 ]
Gheihman, Galina [3 ]
Dobrow, Mark J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Helsingin Yliopisto Laaketieteellinen Tiedekunta, Dept Publ Hlth, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, 155 Coll St,Room 484, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
METHODOLOGY; GOOGLE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005092
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Quality improvement (QI) is becoming an important focal point for health systems. There is increasing interest among health system stakeholders to learn from and share experiences on the use of QI methods and approaches in their work. Yet there are few easily accessible, online repositories dedicated to documenting QI activity. Methods We conducted a scoping review of publicly available, web-based QI repositories to (i) identify current approaches to sharing information on QI practices; (ii) categorise these approaches based on hosting, scope and size, content acquisition and eligibility, content format and search, and evaluation and engagement characteristics; and (iii) review evaluations of the design, usefulness and impact of their online QI practice repositories. The search strategy consisted of traditional database and grey literature searches, as well as expert consultation, with the ultimate aim of identifying and describing QI repositories of practices undertaken in a healthcare context. Results We identified 13 QI repositories and found substantial variation across the five categories. The QI repositories used different terminology (eg, practices vs case studies) and approaches to content acquisition, and varied in terms of primary areas of focus. All provided some means for organising content according to categories or themes and most provided at least rudimentary keyword search functionality. Notably, none of the QI repositories included evaluations of their impact. Discussion With growing interest in sharing and spreading best practices and increasing reliance on QI as a key contributor to health system performance, the role of QI repositories is likely to expand. Designing future QI repositories based on knowledge of the range and type of features available is an important starting point for improving their usefulness and impact.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 303
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COMP STUDY 3 TRANSFO
[3]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616
[4]   The tension between needing to improve care and knowing how to do it [J].
Auerbach, Andrew D. ;
Landefeld, C. Seth ;
Shojania, Kaveh G. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (06) :608-613
[5]  
Baker G.R., 2008, HIGH PERFORMING HEAL
[6]   What is "quality improvement" and how can it transform healthcare? [J].
Batalden, Paul B. ;
Davidoff, Frank .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 16 (01) :2-3
[7]  
Berwick DM., 2002, Curing Health Care: New Strategies for Quality Improvement
[8]   Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team's experience with Arksey and O'Malley's framework [J].
Daudt, Helena M. L. ;
van Mossel, Catherine ;
Scott, Samantha J. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
[9]   Google Scholar Versus PubMed in Locating Primary Literature to Answer Drug-Related Questions [J].
Freeman, Maisha Kelly ;
Lauderdale, Stacy A. ;
Kendrach, Michael G. ;
Woolley, Thomas W. .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2009, 43 (03) :478-484
[10]   Clarifying differences between review designs and methods [J].
Gough D. ;
Thomas J. ;
Oliver S. .
Systematic Reviews, 1 (1)