Intelligence Augmentation in Nondestructive Evaluation

被引:7
作者
Aldrin, John C. [2 ]
Lindgren, Eric A. [1 ]
Forsyth, David S. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Air Force, Res Lab AFRL RXCA, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433 USA
[2] Computat Tools, 4275 Chatham Ave, Gurnee, IL 60031 USA
[3] TRI Austin, Austin, TX 78746 USA
来源
45TH ANNUAL REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOL 38 | 2019年 / 2102卷
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.5099732
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
In recent years, advances have been made in the field of machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI), primarily through developments in deep learning neural networks (DLNN). Challenges however exist with transitioning emerging DLNN algorithms directly for NDE applications. As a counterpoint to AI, intelligence augmentation (IA) refers to the effective use of information technology to enhance human intelligence. While attempting to replicate the human mind has encountered many obstacles over the years, IA has a much longer history of success. All forms of information technology, from writing cuneiform on clay tables to computers and smartphones today, have essentially been developed to enhance the information processing capabilities of the human mind. This paper introduces a series of best practices for intelligence augmentation in NDE, highlighting how the operator should interface with NDE data and algorithms. Algorithms clearly have a great potential to help alleviate the burden of 'big data' in NDE; however, it is important that operators are involved in both secondary indication review, and the detection of rare event indications not addressed well by typical algorithms. Several past examples of transitioning algorithms for NDE applications are presented, emphasizing the successful interfacing of operator and software for optimal data review and decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Quantitative nondestructive evaluation [J].
Achenbach, JD .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2000, 37 (1-2) :13-27
[2]  
Aldrin J, 2001, MATER EVAL, V59, P1313
[3]  
Aldrin J. C., 2016, AIP C P, V1706
[4]   Advanced echo-dynamic measures for the characterisation of multiple ultrasonic signals in aircraft structures [J].
Aldrin, JC ;
Kropas-Hughes, CV ;
Knopp, J ;
Mandeville, J ;
Judd, D ;
Lindgren, E .
INSIGHT, 2006, 48 (03) :144-148
[5]   The Need and Approach for Characterization - US Air Force Perspectives on Materials State Awareness [J].
Aldrin, John C. ;
Lindgren, Eric A. .
44TH ANNUAL REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOL 37, 2018, 1949
[6]   Model-based Probe State Estimation and Crack Inverse Methods Addressing Eddy Current Probe Variability [J].
Aldrin, John C. ;
Oneida, Erin K. ;
Shell, Eric B. ;
Sabbagh, Harold A. ;
Sabbagh, Elias ;
Murphy, R. Kim ;
Mazdiyasni, Siamack ;
Lindgren, Eric A. ;
Mooers, Ryan D. .
43RD REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 2017, 1806
[7]   Best Practices for Evaluating the Capability of Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) and Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) Techniques for Damage Characterization [J].
Aldrin, John C. ;
Annis, Charles ;
Sabbagh, Harold A. ;
Lindgren, Eric A. .
42ND ANNUAL REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION: INCORPORATING THE 6TH EUROPEAN-AMERICAN WORKSHOP ON RELIABILITY OF NDE, 2016, 1706
[8]  
[Anonymous], P 55 AIAA AER SCI M
[9]  
[Anonymous], APPL MAT STATE AWARE
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2009, NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALU