Over a century of detection and quantification capabilities in analytical chemistry - Historical overview and trends

被引:115
作者
Belter, Magdalena [1 ]
Sajnog, Adam [1 ]
Baralkiewicz, Danuta [1 ]
机构
[1] Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Fac Chem, Dept Trace Element Anal Spect Method, PL-61614 Poznan, Poland
关键词
Detection limit; Quantification limit; Historical and modern approaches; Review; DETECTION LIMITS; UNIVARIATE CALIBRATION; QUALITATIVE DETECTION; INVERSE REGRESSION; DECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.talanta.2014.05.018
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The detection limit (L-D) and the quantification limit (L-Q) are important parameters in the validation process. Estimation of these parameters is especially important when trace and ultra-trace quantities of analyte are to be detected. When the apparatus response from the analyte is below the detection limit, it does not necessarily mean that the analyte is not present in the sample. It may be a message that the analyte concentration could be below the detection capabilities of the instrument or analytical method. By using a more sensitive detector or a different analytical method it is possible to quantitatively determine the analyte in a given sample. The terms associated with detection capabilities have been present in the scientific literature for at least the past 100 years. Numerous terms, definitions and approaches to calculations have been presented during that time period. This paper is an attempt to collect and summarize the principal approaches to the definition and calculation of detection and quantification abilities published from the beginning of 20th century up until the present. Some of the most important methods are described in detail. Furthermore, the authors would like to popularize the knowledge of metrology in chemistry, particularly that part of it which concerns validation of the analytical procedure. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:606 / 616
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]  
Currie L. A., 2004, Quantifying Uncertainty in Nuclear Analytical Measurements
[13]   Detection and quantification capabilities and the evaluation of low-level data: Some international perspectives and continuing challenges [J].
Currie, LA .
JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 2000, 245 (01) :145-156
[14]   Detection: International update, and some emerging di-lemmas involving calibration, the blank, and multiple detection decisions [J].
Currie, LA .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 1997, 37 (01) :151-181
[15]   Detection and quantification limits: origins and historical overview [J].
Currie, LA .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1999, 391 (02) :127-134
[16]   NOMENCLATURE IN EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS INCLUDING DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION CAPABILITIES (IUPAC RECOMMENDATIONS 1995) [J].
CURRIE, LA .
PURE AND APPLIED CHEMISTRY, 1995, 67 (10) :1699-1723
[17]   Detection and quantification limits: basic concepts, international harmonization, and outstanding ("low-level") issues [J].
Currie, LA .
APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2004, 61 (2-3) :145-149
[18]   Application of the "glow reaction" to the qualitative detection of the platinum metals. [J].
Curtman, LJ ;
Rothberg, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1911, 33 :718-724
[19]   Using the correct intervals for prediction: A tutorial on tolerance intervals for ordinary least-squares regression [J].
De Gryze, Steven ;
Langhans, Ivan ;
Vandebroek, Martina .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2007, 87 (02) :147-154
[20]  
Feigl F., 1923, MIKROCHEMIE, V1, P74