Pancreatic cancer: Lack of association between apparent diffusion coefficient values and adverse pathological features

被引:38
作者
Rosenkrantz, A. B. [1 ]
Matza, B. W. [1 ]
Sabach, A. [1 ]
Hajdu, C. H. [2 ]
Hindman, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Radiol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Dept Pathol, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
FORMING FOCAL PANCREATITIS; WEIGHTED MRI; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; IMAGE QUALITY; T; CARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA; ABDOMEN; GRADE; MASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2012.11.006
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To identify retrospectively potential associations between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and tumour grade as well as other pathological features, using histopathological assessment from the Whipple procedure as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including diffusion-weighted imaging with b-values of 0 and 500 s/mm(2) before the Whipple procedure. Two radiologists independently recorded the ADC values of the tumour and benign pancreas for all cases. ADC values were compared with histopathological findings following the Whipple procedure. RESULTS: The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.689 for benign pancreas and 0.695 for tumours, indicating good inter-reader agreement for ADC values. The mean ADC value was significantly lower in tumours than in benign pancreas for both readers (reader 1: 1.74 +/- 0.34 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s versus 2.08 +/- 0.48 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively, p = 0.006; reader 2: 1.69 +/- 0.41 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s versus 2.11 +/- 0.54 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in mean ADC between poorly and well/moderately differentiated tumours for either reader (reader 1: 1.69 +/- 0.36 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s versus 1.78 +/- 0.33 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively, p = 0.491; reader 2: 1.62 +/- 0.33 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s versus 1.75 +/- 0.49 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively, p = 0.405). The area under the curve (AUC) for differentiation of poorly and well/moderately differentiated tumours was 0.611 and 0.596 for readers 1 and 2, respectively, and was not significantly better than an AUC of 0.500 for either reader (p >= 0.306). In addition, ADC was not significantly different for either reader between tumours with stage T3 versus stage T1/T2, between tumours with and without metastatic peri-pancreatic lymph nodes, or between tumours located in the pancreatic head versus other pancreatic regions (p >= 0.413). CONCLUSION: No associations between ADC values of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and tumour grade or other adverse pathological features were observed. (C) 2012 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:E191 / E197
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Prognostic factors in resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Analysis of actual 5-year survivors [J].
Cleary, SP ;
Gryfe, R ;
Guindi, M ;
Greig, P ;
Smith, L ;
Mackenzie, R ;
Strasberg, S ;
Hanna, S ;
Taylor, B ;
Langer, B ;
Gallinger, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 198 (05) :722-731
[2]   Field Strength and Diffusion Encoding Technique Affect the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements in Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Abdomen [J].
Dale, Brian M. ;
Braithwaite, Adam C. ;
Boll, Daniel T. ;
Merkle, Elmar M. .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2010, 45 (02) :104-108
[3]   Pancreatic Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI): Comparison Between Mass-Forming Focal Pancreatitis (FP), Pancreatic Cancer (PC), and Normal Pancreas [J].
Fattahi, Rana ;
Balci, N. Cem ;
Perman, William H. ;
Hsueh, Eddy C. ;
Alkaade, Samer ;
Havlioglu, Necat ;
Burton, Frank R. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 29 (02) :350-356
[4]   Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Variability of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Findings [J].
Fukukura, Yoshihiko ;
Takumi, Koji ;
Kamimura, Kiyohisa ;
Shindo, Toshikazu ;
Kumagae, Yuichi ;
Tateyama, Akihiro ;
Nakajo, Masayuki .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 263 (03) :732-740
[5]   Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Differentiating Benign From Malignant Skull Lesions and Correlation With Cell Density [J].
Ginat, Daniel T. ;
Mangla, Rajiv ;
Yeaney, Gabrielle ;
Johnson, Mahlon ;
Ekholm, Sven .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (06) :W597-W601
[6]   Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: Comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics [J].
Guo, AC ;
Cummings, TJ ;
Dash, RC ;
Provenzale, JM .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (01) :177-183
[7]  
Jemal A, 2009, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V59, P225, DOI [10.3322/caac.20006, 10.3322/caac.21387]
[8]   Differentiation of Autoimmune Pancreatitis From Pancreatic Cancer by Diffusion-Weighted MRI [J].
Kamisawa, Terumi ;
Takuma, Kensuke ;
Anjiki, Hajime ;
Egawa, Naoto ;
Hata, Tastuo ;
Kurata, Masanao ;
Honda, Goro ;
Tsuruta, Kouji ;
Suzuki, Mizuka ;
Kamata, Noriko ;
Sasaki, Tsuneo .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 (08) :1870-1875
[9]   Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreas tumours [J].
Kartalis, Nikolaos ;
Lindholm, Terri L. ;
Aspelin, Peter ;
Permert, Johan ;
Albiin, Nils .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (08) :1981-1990
[10]   Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: Applications and challenges in oncology [J].
Koh, Dow-Mu ;
Collins, David J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 188 (06) :1622-1635