A comparison of Angoff and Bookmark standard setting methods

被引:34
|
作者
Buckendahl, CW
Smith, RW
Impara, JC
Plake, BS
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Buros Inst Assessment Consultat & Outreach, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Oscar & Luella Buros Ctr Testing, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-3984.2002.tb01177.x
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This article presents a comparison of simplified variations on two prevalent methods, Angoff and Bookmark, for setting cut scores on educational assessments. The comparison is presented through an application with a Grade 7 Mathematics Assessment in a midwestern school district. Training and operational methods and procedures for each method are described in detail along with comparative results for the application. An alternative item ordering strategy for the Bookmark method that may increase its usability is also introduced. Although the Angoff method is more widely used, the Bookmark method has some promising features, specifically in educational settings. Teachers are able to focus on the expected performance of the "barely proficient" student without the additional challenge of estimating absolute item difficulty.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 263
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Possibility of independent use of the yes/no Angoff and Hofstee methods for the standard setting of the Korean Medical Licensing Examination written test: a descriptive study
    Kim, Do-Hwan
    Kang, Ye Ji
    Park, Hoon-Ki
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2022, 19
  • [43] Evaluating methodological enhancements to the Yes/No Angoff standard-setting method in language proficiency assessment
    Fechter, Tia M.
    Yoon, Heeyeon
    LANGUAGE TESTING, 2024, 41 (03) : 530 - 556
  • [44] Using Cluster Analysis to validate the Angoff Standard Setting Method in Mixed-format Assessments
    Tseng, Fen-Lan
    Chiou, Jia-Min
    Sung, Yao-Ting
    2017 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NATURAL COMPUTATION, FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY (ICNC-FSKD), 2017, : 2540 - 2546
  • [45] Reliability and credibility of an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing using recent graduates as judges
    Verhoeven, BH
    Van der Steeg, AFW
    Scherpbier, AJJA
    Muijtjens, AMM
    Verwijnen, GM
    van der Vleuten, CPM
    MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1999, 33 (11) : 832 - 837
  • [46] Rapid reliability assessment of Angoff standard setting: A novel online tool using generalizability theory
    Tavakol, Mohsen
    Stewart, Claire
    Sharpe, Claire C.
    O'Brien, David G.
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2024, 46 (12) : 1650 - 1650
  • [47] The Impact of Process Instructions on Judges' Use of Examinee Performance Data in Angoff Standard Setting Exercises
    Mee, Janet
    Clauser, Brian E.
    Margolis, Melissa J.
    EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2013, 32 (03) : 27 - 35
  • [48] How to... Apply the Bookmark standard-setting method to a machine-marked test
    Matthews, Phil
    EDUCATION FOR PRIMARY CARE, 2011, 22 (01) : 49 - 51
  • [49] Application of the Bookmark method: setting standard for the ninth-grade mathematics achievement test in China
    Li, Guangming
    Wu, Yuelin
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (33) : 28941 - 28952
  • [50] Application of the Bookmark method: setting standard for the ninth-grade mathematics achievement test in China
    Guangming Li
    Yuelin Wu
    Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 28941 - 28952