Intrauterine Device Placement During Cesarean Delivery and Continued Use 6 Months Postpartum A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:49
作者
Levi, Erika E. [1 ]
Stuart, Gretchen S.
Zerden, Matthew L.
Garrett, Joanne M.
Bryant, Amy G.
机构
[1] 1695 Eastchester Rd,Suite 302, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION; INSERTION; VISIT; IUD; OUTCOMES; WOMEN; COST;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0000000000000882
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare intrauterine device (IUD) use at 6 months postpartum among women who underwent intracesarean delivery (during cesarean delivery) IUD placement compared with women who planned for interval IUD placement 6 or more weeks postpartum. METHODS: In this nonblinded randomized trial, women who were undergoing a cesarean delivery and desired an IUD were randomized to intracesarean delivery or interval IUD placement. The primary outcome was IUD use at 6 months postpartum. A sample size of 112 (56 in each group) was planned to detect a 15% difference in IUD use at 6 months postpartum between groups. RESULTS: From March 2012 to June 2014, 172 women were screened and 112 women were randomized into the trial. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Data regarding IUD use at 6 months postpartum were available for 98 women, 48 and 50 women in the intracesarean delivery and interval groups, respectively. A larger proportion of the women in the intracesarean delivery group were using an IUD at 6 months postpartum (40/48 [83%]) compared with those in the interval group (32/50 [64%], relative risk 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.66). Among the 56 women randomized to interval IUD insertion, 22 (39%) of them never received an IUD; 14 (25%) never returned for IUD placement, five (9%) women declined an IUD, and three (5%) had a failed IUD placement. CONCLUSION: Intrauterine device placement at the time of cesarean delivery leads to a higher proportion of IUD use at 6 months postpartum when compared with interval IUD placement.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 11
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Global fee prohibits postpartum provision of the most effective reversible contraceptives [J].
Aiken, Abigail R. A. ;
Creinin, Mitchell D. ;
Kaunitz, Andrew M. ;
Nelson, Anita L. ;
Trussell, James .
CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 90 (05) :466-467
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Obstet Gynecol, V118, P184, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318227f05e
[3]   The Effect of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception on Rapid Repeat Pregnancy in Adolescents: A Review [J].
Baldwin, Maureen K. ;
Edelman, Alison B. .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2013, 52 (04) :S47-S53
[4]   A missed opportunity for care: two-visit IUD insertion protocols inhibit placement [J].
Bergin, Ashlee ;
Tristan, Sigrid ;
Terplan, Mishka ;
Gilliam, Melissa L. ;
Whitaker, Amy K. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (06) :694-697
[5]   Predictors of compliance with the postpartum visit among women living in healthy start project areas [J].
Bryant, Allison S. ;
Haas, Jennifer S. ;
McElrath, Thomas F. ;
McCormick, Marie C. .
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2006, 10 (06) :511-516
[6]   Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices [J].
Çelen, S ;
Möröy, P ;
Sucak, A ;
Aktulay, A ;
Danisman, N .
CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 69 (04) :279-282
[7]   Use of Postpartum Care: Predictors and Barriers [J].
DiBari, Jessica N. ;
Yu, Stella M. ;
Chao, Shin M. ;
Lu, Michael C. .
JOURNAL OF PREGNANCY, 2014, 2014
[8]   Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices [J].
Grimes, David A. ;
Lopez, Laureen M. ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
van Vliet, Huib A. A. M. ;
Stanwood, Nancy L. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (05)
[9]   Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review [J].
Kapp, Nathalie ;
Curtis, Kathryn M. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2009, 80 (04) :327-336
[10]   The postpartum visit: Risk factors for nonuse and association with breast-feeding [J].
Lu, MC ;
Prentice, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (05) :1329-1336